Improving Peer Review: Alternatives to Unstructured Judgments by a Single Reviewer-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Improving Peer Review: Alternatives to Unstructured Judgments by a Single Reviewer

Published:1996-11 Issue:11 Volume:22 Page:762-769
ISSN:1070-3241
Container-title:The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement
language:en
Short-container-title:The Joint Commission Journal on Quality Improvement

Author:

Goldman Ronald L.,Ciesco Eileen

Publisher

Elsevier BV

Subject

General Medicine

Reference40 articles.

1. Measuring quality of care with explicit process criteria before and after implementation of the DRG-based prospective payment system;Kahn;JAMA,1990

2. The role of peer review in a health care organization driven by TQM/CQI;Wakefield;Jt Comm J Qual Improv,1995

3. The health care quality improvement initiative: A new approach to quality assurance in Medicare;Jencks;JAMA,1992

4. The oversight of medical care: A proposal for reform;Ann Intern Med,1994

5. Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations: 1996 Comprehensive Accreditation Manual for Hospitals. Oakbrook Terrace, IL, 1995, pp 554–557.

Cited by 14 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

1. Reliabilität des Strukturierten Dialogs in der gesetzlich verpflichtenden Qualitätssicherung;Zeitschrift für Evidenz, Fortbildung und Qualität im Gesundheitswesen;2024-05

2. In pursuit of quality and safety: an 8-year study of clinical peer review best practices in US hospitals;International Journal for Quality in Health Care;2018-04-09

3. Role of Clinician Involvement in Patient Safety in Obstetrics and Gynecology;Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology;2010-09

4. Physiotherapists' participation in peer review in New Zealand: Implications for the profession;Physiotherapy Research International;2010-03-23

5. Explicit versus implicit review to explore combination antipsychotic prescribing;Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice;2009-08