Genomic diversity of genus Limosilactobacillus

Abstract

The genus Limosilactobacillus (formerly Lactobacillus ) contains multiple species considered to be adapted to vertebrates, yet their genomic diversity has not been explored. In this study, we performed comparative genomic analysis of Limosilactobacillus (22 species; 332 genomes) isolated from different niches, further focusing on human strains (11 species; 74 genomes) and their adaptation features to specific body sites. Phylogenomic analysis of Limosilactobacillus showed misidentification of some strains deposited in public databases and existence of putative novel Limosilactobacillus species. The pangenome analysis revealed a remarkable genomic diversity (only 1.3 % of gene clusters are shared), and we did not observe a strong association of the accessory genome with different niches. The pangenome of Limosilactobacillus reuteri and Limosilactobacillus fermentum was open, suggesting that acquisition of genes is still occurring. Although most Limosilactobacillus were predicted as antibiotic susceptible (83%), acquired antibiotic-resistance genes were common in L. reuteri from food-producing animals. Genes related to lactic acid isoform production (>95 %) and putative bacteriocins (70.2%) were identified in most Limosilactobacillus strains, while prophages (55.4%) and CRISPR-Cas systems (32.0%) were less prevalent. Among strains from human sources, several metabolic pathways were predicted as conserved and completed. Their accessory genome was highly variable and did not cluster according to different human body sites, with some exceptions (urogenital Limosilactobacillus vaginalis , Limosilactobacillus portuensis , Limosilactobacillus urinaemulieris and Limosilactobacillus coleohominis or gastrointestinal Limosilactobacillus mucosae ). Moreover, we identified 12 Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) orthologues that were significantly enriched in strains from particular body sites. We concluded that evolution of the highly diverse Limosilactobacillus is complex and not always related to niche or human body site origin.