A modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method for accurately testing tigecycline susceptibility: a nation-wide multicenter comparative study

Author:

Yin Dandan12,Guo Yan12,Han Renru12,Yang Yang12,Zhu Demei12,Hu Fupin21ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Key Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology of Antibiotics, Ministry of Health, Shanghai, PR China

2. Institute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, PR China

Abstract

Introduction. Tigecycline is one of the important antibiotics available for treating infection caused by multiple-drug resistant pathogens. However, the conventional AST methods which are commonly used in clinical microbiology laboratories usually lead to false intermediate or resistant results in testing tigecycline susceptibility, and further mislead clinical antimicrobial therapies. Hypothesis. The modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method was performed based on the traditional standard Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (sKB) method. Aim. To evaluate a modified Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion (mKB) method for tigecycline susceptibility testing, for the purpose of providing accurate tigecycline susceptibility results in clinical practice. Methodology. A total of 4271 nonduplicate clinical strains were isolated from 37 hospitals across China to perform the mKB method, standard Kirby–Bauer disc diffusion (sKB) method, comparing with the reference broth microdilution (BMD) according to the CLSI. Parameters of categorical agreement (CA), minor errors (mE), major errors (ME), and very major errors (VME) were used in this methodological evaluation research. Results. BMD testing showed that 91.3–98.9 % of the A. baumannii , K. pneumoniae, E. coli, E. cloacae, S. marcescens, and C. freundii strains were susceptible, while 0–3.1% strains were resistant to tigecycline. When testing A. baumannii , mKB demonstrated higher CA than sKB (90.6 % vs 44.8 %) compared to reference BMD. The mE (9.0 % vs 45.2 %), ME (0.5 % vs 10.6 %) and VME (both 0 %) all satisfied the acceptability criteria. mKB also showed higher CA (87.2 % vs 52.0 %) than sKB in comparison with BMD when testing Enterobacterales (mainly K. pneumonia). The ME (0.45 % vs 8.1 %) and VME (both 0 %) but not mE (12.4 % vs 40.4 %) met the acceptability criteria. Conclusion. The mKB method can test bacterial susceptibility to tigecycline more accurately than sKB. For the tigecycline-intermediate or -resistant strains by sKB method, BMD or mKB method should be used to verify the results and report reliable tigecycline susceptibility results.

Funder

National Key Research and Development Program of China

National Natural Science Foundation of China

China Antimicrobial Surveillance Network

Publisher

Microbiology Society

Subject

Microbiology (medical),General Medicine,Microbiology

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3