Judicial Opinions 112–122

Author:

Arahal David R.1ORCID,Busse Hans-Jürgen2ORCID,Bull Carolee T.3ORCID,Christensen Henrik4ORCID,Chuvochina Maria5,Dedysh Svetlana N.6ORCID,Fournier Pierre-Edouard7ORCID,Konstantinidis Konstantinos T.8ORCID,Parker Charles T.9ORCID,Rossello-Mora Ramon10ORCID,Ventosa Antonio11ORCID,Göker Markus12ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Departamento de Microbiología y Ecología, Universitat de València, Valencia, Spain

2. Institut für Mikrobiologie, University of Veterinary Medicine, Veterinärplatz 1, A-1210 Wien, Austria

3. Department of Plant Pathology and Environmental Microbiology, Pennsylvania State University, 211 Buckhout Lab, University Park, PA 16802, USA

4. Department of Veterinary and Animal Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Stigbøjlen 4, 1870 Frederiksberg C, Denmark

5. The University of Queensland, School of Chemistry and Molecular Biosciences, Australian Centre for Ecogenomics, QLD 4072, Australia

6. Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology, Research Center of Biotechnology RAS, Prospect 60-letya Octyabrya 7/2, Moscow 117312, Russia

7. UMR VITROME, IHU - Méditerranée Infection, 19-21 Bd Jean Moulin, 13005 Marseille, France

8. School of Civil & Environmental Engineering and School of Biological Sciences, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

9. NamesforLife, LLC,East Lansing, East Lansing, Okemos, Michigan 48805-0769, USA

10. Department of Animal and Microbial Biodiversity, Institut Mediterrani d’Estudis Avançats, CSIC-UIB, C/Miquel Marqués 21, 07190 Esporles, Illes Balears, Spain

11. Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Sevilla, Sevilla, C/. Prof. Garcia Gonzalez 2, ES-41012 Sevilla, Spain

12. Leibniz Institute DSMZ – German Collection of Microorganisms and Cell Cultures, Inhoffenstrasse 7B, D-38124 Braunschweig, Germany

Abstract

Opinion 112 denies the request to place Seliberia Aristovskaya and Parinkina 1963 (Approved Lists 1980) on the list of rejected names because the information provided is insufficient. For the same reason, Opinion 113 denies the request to reject Shewanella irciniae Lee et al. 2006 and Opinion 114 denies the request to reject the name Enterobacter siamensis Khunthongpan et al. 2014. Opinion 115 rejects the epithet of Moorella thermoautotrophica (Wiegel et al. 1981) Collins et al. 1994, which is regarded as a nomen confusum. To assess the consequences of Rule 8, Opinion 116 revisits names of taxa above the rank of genus which should comprise the stem of the name of a nomenclatural type and a category-specific ending but fail to do so. Such names should be orthographically corrected if the sole error is the inadvertent usage of an incorrect stem or be regarded as illegitimate if otherwise. The necessary corrections are made for a number of names. In Opinion 117, the request to designate Methylothermus subterraneus Hirayama et al. 2011 as the type species of the genus Methylothermus is denied because an equivalent action compatible with the Code was already conducted. In Opinion 118, the possible orthographical correction of the name Flaviaesturariibacter is treated, as are the analogous cases of Fredinandcohnia and Hydrogeniiclostidium . The genus names are corrected to Flaviaestuariibacter, Ferdinandcohnia and Hydrogeniiclostridium , respectively. Opinion 119 concludes that assigning Actinomycetales Buchanan 1917 (Approved Lists 1980) as nomenclatural type of the class Actinobacteria Stackebrandt et al. 1997 would not render that name legitimate if Rule 8 remained retroactive. The request is granted but Actinomycetales is also assigned as type of Actinomycetes Krassilnikov 1949 (Approved Lists 1980). In Opinion 120, the possible orthographical correction of the name Amycolatopsis albidoflavus is treated. It is grammatically corrected to Amycolatopsis albidoflava. Six names which could according to Rule 61 be grammatically corrected by anyone are also corrected. Opinion 121 denies the request to revise Opinion 69 and notes that Opinion 69 does not have the undesirable consequences emphasized in the request. In Opinion 122, the request to reject various taxon names of Mollicutes proposed in 2018 is denied because it is based on misinterpretations of the Code, which are clarified. Alternative ways to solve the perceived problems are outlined. These Opinions were ratified by the voting members of the International Committee on Systematics of Prokaryotes.

Publisher

Microbiology Society

Subject

General Medicine,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics,Microbiology

Cited by 7 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3