Author:
Theelen Hanneke,De Smet Milou,Van Breukelen Dave,Eeckhoudt Laura,Van Gucht Dinska,Adriaens Karolien,Vanhees Claudio
Abstract
In recent years, blended teaching formats have become increasingly important in higher education. Designing effective blended education is challenging and requires a profound knowledge of digital tools and technologies, as well as the didactical proficiency to deploy them effectively and efficiently within the learning environment. However, little is known about didactical design principles to support teachers in creating an effective blended design. This chapter reports on the combined results of two independently conducted extensive literature reviews that investigated (a) didactical strategies, methods, and techniques concerning online education in the existing empirical research on higher education, and (b) the effects of different blended teaching formats, compared to face-to-face education, on learning outcomes and/or psychosocial outcomes in higher education students. It was found that blended education can enhance student achievement and psychosocial well-being, yet that the instructional approach plays a crucial role. Combining the insights of both studies has subsequently led to a series of evidence-informed recommendations to design effective blended education with a view to the broad development of students. Readers will be provided with practical guidance on how to implement these design principles in educational practice.
Reference45 articles.
1. Hodges CB, Moore S, Lockee BB, Trust T, Bond MA. The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. 2020. Available from: https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning
2. Hiltz SR, Turoff M. Education goes digital: The evolution of online learning and the revolution in higher education. Communications of the ACM. 2005;48(10):59-64
3. Obermeier R, Gläser-Zikuda M, Bedenlier S, Kammerl R, Kopp B, Ziegler A, et al. Stress development during emergency remote teaching in higher education. Learning and Individual Differences. 2022;98. DOI: 10.1016/j.lindif.2022.102178
4. Bernard RM, Borokhovski E, Schmid RF, Tamim RM, Abrami PC. A meta-analysis of blended learning and technology use in higher education: From the general to the applied. Journal of Computing in Higher Education. 2014;26(1):87-122. DOI: 10.1007/s12528-013-9077-3 (**)
5. Bredow CA, Roehling PV, Knorp AJ, Sweet AM. To flip or not to flip? A meta-analysis of the efficacy of flipped learning in higher education. Review of Educational Research. 2021;91(6):878-918. DOI: 10.3102/00346543211019122 (**)