Błędy w opiniach biegłych sądowych – w kontekście niesłusznych skazań

Author:

Gruza Ewa1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Uniwersytet Warszawski

Abstract

In current domestic and foreign research and extensive discussions on the reasons for unjust convictions, the main reasons include false confession, errors in the work of investigators and the examination of evidence, including primarily incorrect opinions of experts. In the case of incorrect expert opinions, the most common reasons are insufficient qualifications and experience of the expert and carelessness of conducted research combined with low awareness of the role and importance of giving opinions in the process.

Publisher

University of Warsaw

Reference22 articles.

1. Bedau H. A., Radelet M. L., Miscarriages of Justice in Potentially Capital Cases, “Stanford Law Review” 1987, Vol. 40, No 1

2. Błędy w opiniach biegłych a pomyłki sądowe. Możliwości i sposoby naprawy, Raport Forensic Watch, Warszawa 2015

3. Borchard E. M., Convicting the Innocent: Sixty-Five Actual Errors of Criminal Justice, New York 1932

4. Chojniak Ł. (red.), Niesłuszne skazania − przyczyny i skutki, Warszawa 2017

5. Chojniak Ł., Wiśniewski Ł., Przyczyny niesłusznych skazań w Polsce, Warszawa 2012

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3