False opinion or false alarm? About the criminal liability of an expert for giving a false opinion

Author:

Hrehorowicz Małgorzata1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Adam Mickiewicz University

Abstract

This article aims to address the significance of the problem regarding the issuance of false expert opinions in practice. This issue is of great importance and considerably consequential for the public opinion. An expert opinion that is unfavorable to a party often raises suspicions of bribery and manipulation. However, not every litigant’s dissatisfaction necessarily implies a criminal offense. This article highlights the magnitude of the problem of false expert opinions in the Polish justice system and the consequential effects associated with it. In the preparation of the article, a review of domestic and international literature and an analysis of criminal case files on the offence of Article 233 § 4 of the Penal Code were used. The results of the research show that the issue of the crime of issuing a false opinion by an expert has not yet received a comprehensive analysis in the domestic and international literature. The number of criminal cases concerning the issuance of a false opinion by an expert is not significant. Courts usually acquit defendants of this offence which may mean that it is difficult to prove in practice. However, the problem is not as high profile as it presents itself to the public. The results of the research can be used to supplement theoretical considerations of the issue. The results can also be used by practitioners to introduce changes to increase the effectiveness of prosecuting the perpetrators of these crimes or to analyse legislative changes.

Publisher

Uniwersytet Jagiellonski - Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellonskiego

Reference27 articles.

1. 1. Act of 11 March 2016 amending the Act - Code of Criminal Procedure and certain other acts (2016). Journal of Laws (437).

2. 2. Act of 6 June 1997 -Penal Code (2022). Journal of Laws (1138).

3. Ethics in forensic science: professional standards for the practice of criminalistics;Barnett;CRC Press,2001

4. 4. Bojarski, M. (2000). Problemy odpowiedzialności karnej i dyscyplinarnej biegłego. Jurisprudencija. 18(10), 24-28.

5. 5. Case of the District Court for Kraków-Śródmieście in Kraków, XIV 650/08 (District Court for Kraków-Śródmieście in Kraków XIV 650/08).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3