Abstract
As an influential legal idea, Satjipto Rahardjo’s progressive law has colored various legal discourses and practices in Indonesia. Court decisions, as legal texts that record and summarize the trial process, also show that litigants, experts, and court judges often use this legal idea. This research will examine how progressive legal phrases are used in court decisions and whether the users have considered their underlying assumptions, pillars, or principles. This research is limited to Constitutional Court decisions in law review cases. The use of progressive legal phrases is generally accompanied by several progressive legal assumptions proposed by Satjipto Rahardjo. However, these are selected and used partially according to the needs and interests of their users, and thus can have bias implications when compared and examined comprehensively based on other assumptions or pillars.
Publisher
Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia
Reference51 articles.
1. Ali, Mohammad Mahrus. Tafsir Konstitusi: Menguji Konstitusionalitas dan Legalitas Norma. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2019.
2. Anggono, Bayu Dwi. “Omnibus Law sebagai Teknik Pembentukan Undang-Undang: Peluang Adopsi dan Tantangannya dalam Sistem Perundang-Undangan Indonesia.” Jurnal RechtsVinding 9, no. 1 (2020): 17-37. DOI: 10.33331/rechtsvinding.v9i1.389.
3. Armia, Muhammad Siddiq. “Constitutional Court and Judicial Review: Lesson Learned for Indonesia.” Negara Hukum 8, no. 1 (2017): 107-30. DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v8i1.940.
4. Asshiddiqie, Jimly. Model-model Pengujian Konstitusional di Berbagai Negara. Jakarta: Konstitusi Press, 2005.
5. Aulia, M. Zulfa. “Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo: Riwayat, Urgensi, dan Relevansi.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 1, no. 1 (2018): 159-85. DOI: 10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献