Abstract
Rainfall-runoff models are frequently used by hydrologists to estimate runoff from rainfall and climate data, with the model adequacy assessed by comparing the level of agreement between flows simulated by the model and the recorded flows. This paper describes simple methods (visual plots, statistical parameters and dimensionless coefficients) which are commonly used to compare estimated and recorded streamflow time series and discusses their advantages and limitations. Results of a survey conducted to ascertain the required quality of flow estimates before they are considered to be satisfactory, as well as to identify preferred methods used by hydrologists in Australia to determine the adequacy of streamflow estimates, are also discussed in this paper. Information from the survey is also used to suggest objective criteria based on dimensionless coefficients that can be used as guides in assessing the adequacy of flows estimated by rainfall-runoff models. In particular, the coefficient of efficiency is a very useful indicator in assessing model adequacy.
Subject
Earth-Surface Processes,Soil Science,Environmental Science (miscellaneous)
Cited by
58 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献