Prediction of diet quality for sheep from faecal characteristics: comparison of near-infrared spectroscopy and conventional chemistry predictive models

Author:

Kneebone D. G.,Dryden G. McL.

Abstract

This study evaluated the ability of equations developed from the analysis of faecal material by conventional chemistry (F.CHEM), and by near-infrared spectroscopy (F.NIRS), to predict intake and digestibility of forages fed with or without supplements. In vivo datasets were obtained using 30 sheep and 25 diets to provide 124 diet–faecal pairs, with each sheep fed four or five of the diets. The diets were five forages fed alone or with urea, molasses, cottonseed meal or sorghum grain supplements. Ninety-nine diet–faecal pairs were selected at random, but ensuring that all diets were represented and both the F.CHEM and F.NIRS prediction equations were developed from this dataset. The remaining 25 diet–faecal pairs were used as a validation dataset. Regressions for F.CHEM were developed by stepwise regression, and F.NIRS prediction equations were developed by partial least-squares regression. Prediction equations based solely on faecal analyte concentrations (F.CHEMc) had poor predictive ability, and models incorporating faecal constituent excretion rates (F.CHEMe) were the best at predicting feed constituent intakes. These models had slightly lower standard errors of prediction (SEP) for organic matter (OM) intake and digestible OM intake compared with the F.NIRS models that did not include faecal excretion rates. However, F.NIRS models had lower SEP for protein intake and OM digestibility. Good agreement between the F.CHEMe and F.NIRS methods was evident (according to the 95% limits-of-agreement test), and both predicted the reference values precisely and with small bias. Equations derived from a dataset that included representatives of all diets used in the experiment gave much better prediction of diet characteristics than those developed from a dataset constructed entirely at random. Equations for F.NIRS developed in this way successfully predicted the characteristics of diets that included forages fed alone and with the type of supplements used in tropical Australia.

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Subject

Animal Science and Zoology,Food Science

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3