Using PODs to integrate fire and fuels planning

Author:

Buettner William C.ORCID,Beeton Tyler A.,Schultz Courtney A.ORCID,Caggiano Michael D.,Greiner Michelle S.

Abstract

Background Potential Wildfire Operational Delineations (PODs) were developed as a pre-season planning tool to promote safe and effective fire response. Past research on PODs has identified uses in an incident management context. There has been little research on how PODs are being utilised in non-incident management contexts to align forest and wildfire planning objectives. Aims We sought to understand how actors are adopting and adapting the PODs framework to inform non-incident management, and to identify facilitators, barriers and recommendations. Methods We investigated three cases, the San Juan National Forest, the San Isabel National Forest and the Washington Department of Natural Resources, through 13 semi-structured, key informant interviews. Key results We found that PODs were helpful for validating fuels treatment plans and supporting communication among agency staff, and with private landowners and collaborators. Challenges included lack of technical knowledge and skills, unclear leadership direction, potential misalignment with other forest management goals and community and agency buy-in to using PODs. Conclusions We offer insights into how PODs are being utilised within our case studies and align these findings with diffusion of innovation literature. Implications This preliminary research is important given increased funding for PODs in recent legislation and the possibility of broader adoption for fuels treatment planning in the future.

Funder

USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region under the authority of the Southwest Forest Health and Wildfire Prevention Act

Publisher

CSIRO Publishing

Subject

Ecology,Forestry

Reference33 articles.

1. Beeton TA, Caggiano MD, Colavito MM, Huayhuaca C (2022) Use of Risk Management Assistance During the 2021 Fire Season: A Technical Report. (Southwest Ecological Restoration Institutes) pp. 1–23. Available at

2. Bernard HR (2017) ‘Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches’, 4th edn. (Rowman & Littlefield: New York)

3. Braun V, Clarke V (2012) Thematic analysis. In ‘ APA handbook of research methods in psychology, Vol 2: Research designs: Quantitative, qualitative, neuropsychological, and biological’. (Eds H Cooper, PM Camic, DL Long, AT Panter, D Rindskopf, KJ Sher) pp. 57–71. (American Psychological Association: Washington, DC, USA)

4. Caggiano MD, O’Connor CD, Sack RB (2020) Potential Operational Delineations and Northern New Mexico’s 2019 Fire Season. CFRI-2020. Available at

5. Knowledge systems for sustainable development.;Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences,2003

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3