Abstract
Background United States federal wildland fire policy requires the use of formal decision support systems (DSS) for fire incidents that last for an extended time. However, the ways that wildfire managers use DSSs in decisions regarding fire management remain understudied, including how users engage with or utilise them to make strategic decisions. Aims Researchers sought to understand how users engage with the Wildland Fire Decision Support System (WFDSS), their view of its utilities and challenges, and their perspectives about WFDSS training. Methods We present the results of thematic analysis from 46 semi-structured interviews with employees in the US Forest Service Southwestern Region with a WFDSS user account. Key results Users indicated that the program is viewed as efficient for sharing information about wildfires and documenting management decision rationale. They identified emerging gaps in technical proficiency and the need for specialised training that creates high-level users to help guide teams using the program. Conclusions We offer suggestions about continued use of WFDSS including modifications to information distribution, revision of user roles, and expanded support for skills training. Implications Our results suggest that small changes to the WFDSS program and training curriculum may improve the experience of end-users and better match how they are using the program.
Reference72 articles.
1. Revisiting DSS implementation research: a meta-analysis of the literature and suggestions for researchers.;MIS Quarterly,1992
2. Babbie E (2004) ‘The practice of social research’, 10th edn. (Cengage Learning: Mason, OH)
3. Boyatzis R (1998) ‘Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development.’ (Sage Publications, Inc: Thousand Oaks, CA)
4. Bryman A (2015) ‘Social research methods’, 5th edn. (Oxford University Press: Oxford)
5. A real-time risk assessment tool supporting wildland fire decisionmaking.;Journal of Forestry,2011
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献