Development of a system of integrated assessment of efficiency of cardiac care in the Russian Federation regions
-
Published:2023-02-04
Issue:4S
Volume:11
Page:105-115
-
ISSN:2587-9537
-
Container-title:Complex Issues of Cardiovascular Diseases
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:Kompleks. probl. serdečno-sosud. zabol.
Author:
Mikhailov I. A.1ORCID, Omelyanovsky V. V.2ORCID, Semenov V. Yu.3ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; N.A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education 2. Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation 3. A.N. Bakulev National Medical Research Center of Cardiovascular Surgery
Abstract
Highlights. Methodology for the development of a system of indicators for the integral assessment of effectiveness and efficiency of cardiac care (cardiovascular surgery) in the subjects of the Russian Federation is proposed and tested.Indicators, such as the length of stay, the number of operations on the heart and blood vessels, the number of ambulatory patients have high overall rating and consistency of expert opinions.Aim. To develop a system of indicators for assessment of the effectiveness of cardiac care, cardiovascular surgery in particular, in the Russian Federation regions.Methods. The study using expert surveys was conducted in the form of a structured interview. At the first stage, the primary selection of indicators was carried out using the annual public and field reports of the national medical research center. At the second stage, experts were selected and the level of expert competence was assessed. In total, out of 14 interviewed specialists, 10 were defined as experts. The average expert authority coefficient was 0.89. To quantify the degree of agreement between the experts` answers, Kendall's coefficient of concordance (W) was calculated. The significance of differences was assessed using the nonparametric Friedman test.Results. The following indicators are recommended as indicators for rating efficiency of cardiac care in the regions of the Russian Federation: mortality after heart surgery, vascular surgery and percutaneous coronary interventions; mortality from diseases of the circulatory system; the number of ambulatory patients; the ratio of the number of endovascular interventions to the total number of discharged patients who suffered from acute coronary syndrome.Conclusion. The selected indicators can be used both for the rating of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation, and in the development of federal projects or ministerial target programs. The results of the study can also be used to organize a system for monitoring the effectiveness of the implementation of these projects and programs.
Subject
Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine,Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Rehabilitation,Emergency Medicine,Surgery
Reference14 articles.
1. Roth G.A., Mensah G.A., Johnson C.O., Addolorato G., Ammirati E., Baddour L.M., Barengo N.C., Beaton A.Z., Benjamin E.J., Benziger C.P., Bonny A., Brauer M., Brodmann M., Cahill T.J., Carapetis J., Catapano A.L., Chugh S.S., Cooper L.T., Coresh J., Criqui M., DeCleene N., Eagle K.A., Emmons-Bell S., Feigin V.L., Fernández-Solà J., Fowkes G., Gakidou E., Grundy S.M., He F.J., Howard G., Hu F., Inker L., Karthikeyan G., Kassebaum N., Koroshetz W., Lavie C., Lloyd-Jones D., Lu H.S., Mirijello A., Temesgen A.M., Mokdad A., Moran A.E., Muntner P., Narula J., Neal B., Ntsekhe M., Moraes de Oliveira G., Otto C., Owolabi M., Pratt M., Rajagopalan S., Reitsma M., Ribeiro A.L.P., Rigotti N., Rodgers A., Sable C., Shakil S., Sliwa-Hahnle K., Stark B., Sundström J., Timpel P., Tleyjeh I.M., Valgimigli M., Vos T., Whelton P.K., Yacoub M., Zuhlke L., Murray C., Fuster V. Global Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases and Risk Factors, 1990-2019: Update From the GBD 2019 Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76 (25): 2982–3021. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.11.010 2. Amini M., Zayeri F., Salehi M. Trend analysis of cardiovascular disease mortality, incidence, and mortality-to-incidence ratio: results from global burden of disease study 2017. BMC Public Health. 2021; 21 (1): 401. doi:10.1186/s12889-021-10429-0 3. Matskeplishvili S., Kontsevaya A. Cardiovascular Health, Disease, and Care in Russia. Circulation. 2021; 144 (8): 586–8. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.055239 4. Medvedeva E.A., Zvartau N.E., Villevalde S.V., Yakovlev A.N., Solovieva A.E., Fedorenko A.A., Karlina V.A., Zaitsev V.V., Endubaeva G.V., Panarina S.A., Erastov A.M. Analysis of healthcare for patients with cardiovascular diseases in Russian Federation in comparison with the practice of Europe and USA. Kardiologiia. 2021; 61 (3): 105–14 (in Russian) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.3.n1179 5. Alekyan B.G., Boytsov S.A., Manoshkina E.M., Ganyukov V.I. Myocardial revascularization in Russian Federation for acute coronary syndrome in 2016-2020. Kardiologiia. 2021 ;61 (12): 4–15 (in Russian) doi:10.18087/cardio.2021.12.n1879
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|