Integral rating system approbation of the Russian Federation regions using weight coefficients based on indicators characterizing the effectiveness of the organization of medical care in cardiovascular surgery

Author:

Mikhailov I. A.1,Omelyanovsky V. V.2,Semyonov V. Yu.3,Samsonova E. A.4,Gerasimova K. V.5

Affiliation:

1. Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education

2. Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; N. A. Semashko National Research Institute of Public Health; Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education; Financial Research Institute of the Ministry of Finance of the Russian Federation

3. Bakulev National Medical Research Center of Cardiovascular Surgery

4. Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation

5. Center of Expertise and Quality Control of Healthcare of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation; Russian Medical Academy for Continuous Professional Education

Abstract

Aim. Integral rating system approbation of the Russian Federation regions using weight coefficients based on indicators characterizing the effectiveness of the organization of medical care in cardiovascular surgery.Methods. The study included 6 indicators with the highest final rating and expert agreement coefficient (based on data from the previous study). The values of the indicators were calculated for 38 Russian Federation regions supervised by the national medical research centers in cardiovascular surgery based on the statistical data provided by the Russian Federation regions and compared with the data of federal statistical observation forms. Further, all indicators were transferred to a point scale to form a single integral rating. The value in points for each of the indicators was multiplied by the corresponding weight coefficient for each subject of the Russian Federation. At the end, we performed a comparative analysis of the two integral ratings and expert validation.Results. It was found that the Moscow Region is in first place (880.00 points) based on the results of building an integral rating using weight coefficients. In second place instead of the Tambov region is the Republic of Bashkortostan (760.71 points). The third position of the Lipetsk region is occupied by the Samara region (750.89 points). The Smolensk region (259.28 points) occupies the 38th place in the integral rating with the use of weight coefficients, as well as in the ranking without the use of weight coefficients. The Republic of Ingushetiya (+18 seats) and the Republic of Dagestan (+17 seats) are characterized by the greatest positive change in the number of seats. The Kirov region (-16 places), the Penza region (-16 places), as well as the Tula region (-11 places) and the Vladimir region (-11 places) are characterized by the greatest change in the number of seats in the negative direction.Conclusion. Presented system of integral rating of the Russian Federation regions with weight coefficients demonstrated the principal adequacy of all proposed approaches in relation to the real situation with the organization of medical care in the Russian Federation regions, and also made it possible, through the use of weight coefficients, to take into account the varying degree of contribution of the indicators used to the integral rating of the Russian Federation regions. In the same time the indicators should be choose very careful.

Publisher

Arterialnaya Gipertenziya

Reference12 articles.

1. World Health Organization (WHO). Global status report on noncommunicable diseases 2010. World Health Organization; 2011.

2. Meara JG, Leather AJM, Hagander L, et al. Global Surgery 2030: evidence and solutions for achieving health, welfare, and economic development. Lancet (London, England). 2015 Aug;386(9993):569–624.

3. Vervoort D. Global cardiac surgery: a wake-up call. Eur J cardio-thoracic Surg Off J Eur Assoc Cardiothoracic Surg. 2019 May;55(5):1022–3.

4. Yankah C, Fynn-Thompson F, Antunes M, et al. Cardiac Surgery Capacity in Sub—Saharan Africa: Quo Vadis? Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2014;62(05):393–401.

5. Pezzella AT. Global aspects of cardiothoracic surgery with focus on developing countries. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann. 2010 Jun;18(3):299–310.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3