Affiliation:
1. Department für Agrarökonomie und Rurale Entwicklung, Betriebswirtschaftslehre des Agribusiness, Georg August Universität Göttingen, Platz der Göttinger Sieben 5, 37073 Göttingen, Germany.
2. University of Hohenheim, Institute for Agricultural Policy and Markets, Department Consumer Behaviour in the Bioeconomy, Wollgrasweg 49, 70599 Stuttgart, Germany.
Abstract
The European protein production deficit in livestock feed is currently being covered by soy imports, especially from America. However, these imports are being criticised for social, ecological and economic reasons. In order to close the European protein gap, alternative protein sources are increasingly being searched for. The use of insects represents an innovative approach, highlighting their advantages of high protein content and good nutrient composition, as well as their sustainable production methods. To establish insects as innovation in the livestock industry, their acceptance along the value chain is essential. The present study analyses the acceptance of insects as an alternative protein source in feed by poultry and pig farmers in France (n=84) and the Netherlands (n=182). The study results indicate that French and Dutch livestock farmers would use insects as an alternative protein feed, because their usefulness and benefits are paramount. The importance of support by family and farm members as well as colleagues is confirmed in this study, whereas perceptions of effort and risk are not significant influencing factors. Furthermore, age, gender, freedom to choose feed components, and nationality do not significantly determine the main effects of the model. Overall, the results of the study indicate a positive perception in both countries of insects as feed, which is a good prerequisite for the introduction of insects as feed as an innovation.
Subject
Insect Science,Food Science
Reference60 articles.
1. Ajzen, I., 1985. From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J. and Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action control: from cognition to behavior. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Germany, pp. 11-39. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2
2. Baron, R. and Kenny, D., 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51(6): 1173-1182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173
3. Bellof, G. and Weindl, P., 2016. Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Einsatzes regionaler Eiweißfuttermittel als Ersatz für importiertes Sojaextraktionsschrot. In: Deutsche Vilomix (eds.) Themen zur Tierernährung, Fachtagung 2015/2016. Available at: https://ipaper.ipapercms.dk/DLG/Vilofoss/Brochure/de/themen-zur-tierernahrung/2015-2016/02-eiweiversorgung-bellof-weindl-vilomix-fachgesprach-2016/
4. Böschen, V. and Hummel, J., 2019. Entwicklung geeigneter Verfahren zur Herstellung von Futtermitteln. Schlussbericht zu IGF-Vorhaben-Nr. 28 LN. Available at: https://www.iff-braunschweig.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/IGF-28LN-Herstellung-von-Futtermitteln.pdf
5. Marketing scales handbook – a compilation of multi-item measures1045
Cited by
2 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献