Sampling dried figs for aflatoxin – Part 1: variability associated with sampling, sample preparation, and analysis

Author:

Ozer H.1,Basegmez H.I. Oktay1,Whitaker T.B.2,Slate A.B.2,Giesbrecht F.G.3

Affiliation:

1. TUBITAK Marmara Research Centre Food Institute, P.O. Box 21 41470 Gebze Kocaeli, Turkey.

2. Biological and Agricultural Engineering Department, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 7625, Raleigh, NC 27695-7625, USA.

3. Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, P.O. Box 8203, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203, USA.

Abstract

The variability associated with the aflatoxin test procedure used to estimate aflatoxins in bulk shipments of dried figs was investigated. Sixteen 10 kg laboratory samples were taken from each of twenty commercial bulk lots of dried figs suspected of aflatoxin contamination. Two 55 g test portions were taken from each comminuted laboratory sample using water-slurry comminution methods. Finally, two aliquots from the test portion/solvent blend were analysed for both aflatoxin B1 and total aflatoxins. The total variance associated with testing dried figs for aflatoxins was measured and partitioned into sampling, sample preparation and analytical variance components (total variance is equal to the sum of the sampling variance, sample preparation variance, and analytical variance). Each variance component increased as aflatoxin concentration increased. Using regression analysis, mathematical expressions were developed to model the relationship between aflatoxin concentration and the total, sampling, sample preparation and analytical variances when testing dried figs for aflatoxins. The regression equations were modified to estimate the variances for any sample size, test portion size, and number of analyses for a specific lot aflatoxin concentration. When using the above aflatoxin test procedure to sample a fig lot at 10 μg/kg total aflatoxins, the sampling, sample preparation, analytical, and total variances were 47.20, 0.29, 0.13, and 47.62, respectively. The sampling, sample preparation, and analytical steps accounted for 99.1, 0.6, and 0.3% of the total variance, respectively. For the aflatoxin test procedure used in this study, the sampling step is the largest source of variability.

Publisher

Wageningen Academic Publishers

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health,Toxicology,Food Science

Reference20 articles.

1. AOAC International, 2005. Method 999.07, official methods of analysis, 18th edition. AOAC International, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.

2. Codex Committee on Contaminants in Foods (CCCF), 2008. Aflatoxin sampling plans for aflatoxin contamination in ready-to-eat treenuts and treenuts destined for further processing: almonds, hazelnuts, and pistachios, Alinorm 08/31/41, Appendix IX, 31st CAC Session. 30 June to 4 July, 2008. Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/p52k95n.

3. European Commission (EC), 2012. Commission Regulation No. 1058/2012 of 12 November 2012, amending Regulation (EC) No 1881/2006 as regards maximum levels for aflatoxins in dried figs. Official Journal of the European Union L 313: 14-15.

4. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2003. Worldwide regulations for mycotoxins in food and feeds in 2003. FAO Food and Nutrition Paper 81. FAO, Rome, Italy.

5. Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), 2014. Mycotoxin sampling tool. User guide version 1.1. Available at: http://tinyurl.com/od9v9vl.

Cited by 4 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3