Locomotor Requirements for Bipedal Locomotion: A Delphi Survey

Author:

Hedman Lois Deming1,Morris David M.2,Graham Cecilia L.3,Brown Cynthia J.4,Ford Matthew P.5,Ingram Debbie A.6,Hilliard Marjorie J.7,Salzman Alice J.8

Affiliation:

1. L.D. Hedman, PT, DScPT, Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 645 N Michigan Ave, Suite 1100, Chicago, IL 60611 (USA).

2. D.M. Morris, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.

3. C.L. Graham, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

4. C.J. Brown, MD, MSPH, Department of Medicine, The Birmingham/Atlanta VA Geriatric Research Education and Clinical Center, and Department of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

5. M.P. Ford, PT, PhD, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alabama at Birmingham.

6. D.A. Ingram, PT, EdD, Department of Physical Therapy, The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Chattanooga, Tennessee.

7. M.J. Hilliard, PT, EdD, Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

8. A.J. Salzman, PT, EdD, Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

Abstract

BackgroundBipedal locomotor control requirements may be useful as classifications for walking dysfunction because they go beyond gait analysis to address all issues contributing to walking dysfunction.ObjectiveThe objective of this study was to determine whether locomotor experts could achieve consensus about the requirements for bipedal locomotion.Design and MethodsLocomotor experts from physical therapy and other related professions participated in an electronic mail Delphi survey. Experts recommended additions, deletions, rewording, and merges for 15 proposed locomotor requirements in round 1. In rounds 2 and 3, panelists commented on and rated the validity, mutual exclusiveness, and understandability of each requirement. Consensus was defined a priori as: (1) 75% or more panelists agree or strongly agree that a requirement is valid, mutually exclusive, and understandable in round 3; (2) no difference between round 2 and 3 ratings with kappa coefficients ≥.60; and (3) a reduction in panelists who commented and convergence of comments between rounds 1 and 3. Content analysis and nonparametric statistics were used.ResultsFifty-eight panelists reached full consensus on 5 locomotor requirements (Initiation, Termination, Anticipatory Dynamic Balance, Multi-Task Capacity, and Walking Confidence) and partial consensus for 7 other requirements. There were no significant differences in ratings between rounds 2 and 3, and there was a decrease in the percentage of panelists who commented between rounds 1 and 3.LimitationsThe study's 6-month time frame may have contributed to panelist attrition.ConclusionsLocomotor experts achieved consensus on several bipedal locomotor requirements. With validation, these requirements can provide the framework for a clinically feasible and systematic diagnostic tool for physical therapists to categorize locomotor problems and standardize intervention for walking dysfunction.

Publisher

Oxford University Press (OUP)

Subject

Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3