Author:
Velizarova Milena,Yacheva Teodora,Genova Mariana,Svinarov Dobrin
Abstract
Background: DYMIND DH76 (DYMIND BIOTECH, China) is a new automated hematology system designed to provide CBC count, including a 5-part WBC differential count, and its analytical performance should be assessed before adoption for clinical use. Methods: The analyzer was evaluated according to the International Council for Standardization in Haematology guideline. The purposes of this study were to assess its analytical performance in comparison to SYSMEX XN 1000 hematology analyzer currently used in our laboratory, as well as to compare the automated and manual WBC differential. Results: Within-run precision in all concentration ranges was very good with coefficients of variation (CVs) between 0.02% and 2.5% except for platelets over 500×109/L (CV 9.5%). Within-batch imprecision showed CVs lower the declared deviation ranges. Accuracy (defined as trueness) was excellent for all CBC and white cell differential parameters, compared with the state of the art%. Linearity was confirmed with excellent regression coefficients (0.999-1.000), even in the lowest values, and carryover was ≤ 1%. Comparison between DYMIND DH76 and SYSMEX XN 1000 was also very good with correlation coefficients (R2) for WBC (1.000), RBC (0.999), hemoglobin (0.999) and PLT over 50×109/L (0.994) and R2 was lower but still acceptable (0.910) for PLT<50×109/L. R2 for neutrophils, lymphocytes, eosinophils, basophils, and monocytes were 0.974, 0.982, 0.957, 0.625, and 0.836, respectively, in the comparison between the manual and DYMIND DH76 automated differential WBC counts. Conclusions: With excellent analytical performance and acceptable comparative analysis, DYMIND DH76 hematology analyser covered the predefined international standards and requirements and is fully appropriate for clinical application.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Subject
Biochemistry (medical),Clinical Biochemistry
Reference20 articles.
1. Briggs C, Culp N, Davis B, d'Onofrio G, Zini G, Machin SJ. ICSH guidelines for the evaluation of blood cell analysers including those used for differential leucocyte and reticulocyte counting. Int J Lab Hematol 2014; 36: 613-27;
2. Verbrugge SE, Huisman A. Verification and standardization of blood cell counters for routine clinical laboratory tests. Clin Lab Med 2015; 35: 183-96;
3. Validation, verification, and quality assurance of automated hematology analyzers. Approved standard. 2nd ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI Document H26-A2: 2010;
4. Vis JY, Huisman A. Verification and quality control of routine hematology analyzers. Int J Lab Hematol 2016; 38: Suppl 1: 100-9;
5. Koepke AA, National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Reference leukocyte (WBC) differential count (proportional) and evaluation of instrumental methods: Approved Standard. H20-A2. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2007;
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献