Author:
Rodić Marijana,Marić Slobodan
Abstract
The scope of this study is based on the Situational Leadership Theory according to the model created by Hersey and Blanchard, predominantly defined by two research sub-fields: leadership style and readiness of employees. This model distinguishes four different leadership styles, while the subject area of readiness of employees comprises two components: readiness of employees based on the competency component and readiness of employees based on a psychological (motivational) component. The subject matter of the study is to identify leadership style as a new variable which will be utilized for determining the interdependence with leadership efficiency levels and readiness of employees. Leadership efficiency is determined by the degree of compatibility between the dominant style of leadership and the level of readiness of employees. In addition to the main objective of the research, aimed at determining leadership efficiency, significant research findings come as a result of specific objectives. That is impact of the dominant leadership style on readiness of employees and leadership results, based on each specific component. The sample will be a random sample from a finite population of units, with repeated sampling and known probability sampling. A sample of size n=100, with a proportion of 0.10, is based on a list of top 100 biggest companies in the Republic of Serbia in 2019. The application of Principal Component Analysis aims to identify new variables in the form of regression coefficient results, while the application of the hierarchical regression model will help determine the impact of each leadership style on readiness of employees. The study findings confirm the basic hypotheses of the aforementioned model, with regard to the results of leadership efficiency, as well as its impact of each leadership style on readiness of employees.
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference53 articles.
1. Adair, J. (1973). Action-Centred Leadership. New York: McGraw-Hill;
2. Bartlett, M. (1954). A note on the multiplying factors for various chi-square approximations. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 16 (2), 296-298;
3. Bass, B. (1990). Bass and Stogdill's Handbook of Leadership (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press;
4. Blake, R.R., & Mouton, J.S. (1982). A Comparative Analysis of Situationalism and 9,9 Management by Principle. Organizational Dynamics, 10 (4), 20-43. https://doi.org/10.1016/0090-2616(82)90027-4;
5. Blanchard, K.H. (2007). Leading at a Higher Level. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Prentice-Hall;