Sustainability balanced scorecard: Four performance perspectives or more?

Author:

Rašić-Jelavić Sanda,Pajdaković-Vulić Mirna

Abstract

This paper analyzes the Sustainability Balanced Scorecard (SBSC) as a renewed framework for measuring and managing sustainability performance of a company. The paper presents the main characteristics of original Balanced Scorecard (BSC), explains its purpose and main performance perspectives. Based on literature review, paper address the various approaches to design and prioritize performance perspectives within the SBSC. Firstly, casual links within and between performance perspectives are described: hierarchical links (as is in original BSC approach), semi-hierarchical links and network links. Secondly, the paper explains how the sustainability issues are incorporated within SBSC framework. Several solutions are explained as suggested in the literature: (1) adding additional single or multiple performance perspectives to deal with strategically important sustainability issues, (2) incorporating sustainability aspects within original four performance perspectives, (3) adding additional sustainability perspectives and incorporating sustainability aspects in four original performance perspectives simultaneously, (4) organize separate SBSC for managing only sustainability issues. Specific features of these approaches are explained as well as appropriateness of their application in practice. Advantages and disadvantages of SBSC are highlighted and recommendations for future research.

Publisher

Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)

Reference56 articles.

1. Atkinson, A. A., Kaplan, S. R., Matsmura, M. E., & Young, M. S. (2007). Management accounting. New Jersey: Pearson Education Inc;

2. Bakotić, D. (2012). Organizacijske razine mjerenja performansi. Praktični menadžment, 3(4), 57-61. Retrieved October 1, 2020, from https://hrcak.srce.hr/96966;

3. Belak, V.(2002). Bilanca postignuća u planiranju i praćenju rezultata poslovanja. RRiF, 11, 1-20. Retrieved August 20, 2020, from https://www.rrif.hr/clanak-3853;

4. Bieker, T., Dyllick, T., Gminder, C. U., & Hockerts, K. (2001). Towards a sustainability balanced scorecard: Linking environmental and social sustainability to business strategy. In Conference proceedings of business strategy and the environment 2001, Leeds, 21-31. Retrieved 15 August 2020, from https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-014-2340-3;

5. Bieker, T., & Waxenberger, B. (2002). Sustainability balanced scorecard and business ethics: Developing a balanced scorecard for integrity management. In Hansen, E.G., & Schaltegger, S. (2016). The Sustainability Balanced Scorecard: A Systematic Review of Architectures. Journal of Business Ethics, 133, 193-221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2340-3;

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3