Abstract
State and local governments in e-tools have important instruments of quality management and the creation and implementation of sectoral policies. Smart city projects provide excellent services to citizens, increase the transparency and accountability of authorities, as well as citizens' satisfaction with services. Participative edecision-making is useful because citizens are indispensable for expressing their needs, assessing the quality of services, and setting requests and initiatives (co-production). On the other hand, it is also important to include public servants who ensure that decisions are optimally shaped and that services are tailored according to the needs of specific people (personalization of services) and the community. Serbia has a systemic problem of centralization, a top-down approach to management, weak participation of citizens and weak involvement of experts in the work of e-government. Good practice indicates that e-government cannot function without the active involvement of citizens, so our system needs to be changed and improved. These changes would also modernize management, decision making and policy making (evidence based decision and policy making). The consequence would be the creation of services according to the needs of citizens, which increases citizens' satisfaction with the quality of services. In addition, these processes strengthen the socialization of citizens, strengthen democratic capacities of communities, and raise the motivation of employees to contribute to the quality of work (strengthening of professionalization, motivation and dignity of public servants).
Publisher
Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
Reference19 articles.
1. Caragliu, Andrea, Chiara Del Bo, and Peter Nijkamp. 2011. "Smart Cities in Europe." Journal of Urban Technology 18 (2): 65-82. doi: 10.1080/10630732.2011.601117;
2. Cordella, Antonio, and Nicollo Tempini. 2011. E-Government and Bureaucracy: The Role of Functional Simplification in the Case of the Venice Municipality, Gov. Workshop 2011, West London: Brunel Univercity UB8 3PH;
3. Curwell, Steve, Mark Deaklin, Ian Cooper, and Kressimira Paskaleva. 2005. "Citizens' Expectations of Infomation Cities: Implications for Urban Planning and Design.ˮ Building Research & Information 33 (1): 55-66. doi: 10.1080/0961321042000329422;
4. De Boer, Noortje, and Nadine Raaphorst. 2021. "Automation and discretion: explaining the effect of automation on how street-level bureaucrats enforce." Public Management Review 25 (1): 42-62. doi: 10.1080/14719037.2021.1937684;
5. Đorđević, Snežana. 2019 "Smart Policies and Innovative Services.ˮ In The Future of Cities, eds. Borislav Stojkov, 361-374. Beograd: Academy of Engineering sciences, BU, Faculty of Geography;