Abstract
This study investigated social-media-based anti-brand communication. Guided by consumer boycotts and brand cancellation theory, the author conducted a qualitative study based on content analysis of tweets about 59 international brands that remained in Russia after the invasion in February 2022. The research was conducted on Twitter between August 10 and 17, 2022. The study aimed to determine whether brands that have decided to stay in Russia are still exposed to negative WoM, calls for a boycott or brand cancellation after 6 months since the war began. The obtained results made it possible to identify the number of tweets and their content and sentiment. They also showed the dynamics of negative WoM publications on social media and their character. The practical implications are the following: brands exposed to consumer boycotts, depending on their business goals, may decide to adopt a “wait-out” strategy.
Reference43 articles.
1. A new English dictionary on historical principles: Founded mainly on the materials collected by the Philological Society. (1888). Clarendon Press. http://archive.org/details/oed01arch
2. Almossa, S.Y. (2021). University students' perspectives toward learning and assessment during COVID-19. Education and Information Technologies, 26(6), 7163-7181. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10554-8
3. Boycotts List. (2018, April 16). Ethical Consumer. https://www.ethicalconsumer.org/ethicalcampaigns/boycotts
4. Caldwell, C., Davis, B., & Devine, J.A. (2009). Trust, faith, and betrayal: Insights from management for the wise believer. Journal of Business Ethics, 84, 103-114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-008-9689-0
5. Commetric. (2020, October 5). Brand boycotts: Lessons from the latest social media storms. https://commetric.com/2020/10/05/consumer-boycotts-lessons-from-the-latest-social-media-storms/
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献