Test Development For Comprehension Skills In Teaching Turkish As A Foregin Language: The Case of Gazi University TÖMER

Author:

Temür Nezir1ORCID,Güngör Haluk1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. GAZI UNIVERSITY, GAZİ FACULTY OF EDUCATION, DEPARTMENT OF TURKISH EDUCATION

Abstract

In this research, the validity and reliability of the C1 certification exam prepared by Gazi University TÖMER used in teaching Turkish as a foreign language was examined. The sample of the research consists of reading and listening test data of 250 participants who came to TÖMER between January and October 2023 and took the face-to-face exam. The content validity of the tests was ensured by the table of specifications created by the researchers. The test items were prepared based on CEFR (2020) qualifications and achievements in the MEB Teaching Turkish as a Foreign Language Program (2020). The prepared test forms were presented to expert opinion and necessary arrangements were made in line with the suggestions. After the test preparation phase was completed, the administration of the exams started. After the sample size reached a sufficient number, data analysis began. In addition to descriptive analyzes such as percentage and frequency, factor analysis, item difficulty indices, item discrimination indices, reliability coefficient, average difficulty and average discrimination indices were calculated on the data. Factor analyzes of the tests were performed in the R-based Shiny application. One-dimensional tests were obtained by deleting 6 items from the reading test and 8 items from the listening test with factor load values below .40. In terms of reliability and discrimination, the reading test generally has high reliability and discrimination; It was determined that the listening test had good reliability and discrimination and it was an easy test. When the item analyzes of the reading test were examined, it was understood that 14 items were good, and when the item analyzes of the listening test were examined, 9 items were good and 3 items could be corrected and included in the test. Based on the findings, it was concluded that the items of the reading exam gave better response than the items of the listening exam and that a significant part of the reading exam could be preserved and used.

Publisher

Social Sciences: Theory and Practice

Reference15 articles.

1. Afflerbach, P. (2005). National reading conference policy brief: High stakes testing and reading assessment. Journal of Literacy Research, 37/2, 151-162.

2. American Educational Research Association & American Psychological Association & National Council On Measurement in Education (2014). Standarts for Educational and Psychological Testing. Washington: Americak Educational Research Association.

3. Başol, G. (2019). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. [Measurement and evaluation in education]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

4. Bilican Demir, S. (2023). Ölçmede geçerlilik. [Validity in measurement] Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. (p. 53-68) içinde. Ankara: Anı Publication.

5. Büyüköztürk, Ş., Çakmak Kılıç, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş. & Demirel, F. (2016). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. [Scientific research methods]. Ankara: Pegem Academy.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3