Affiliation:
1. Department of Field Crops, Kızıltepe Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technologies, Mardin Artuklu University, 47000, Mardin, Türkiye; Department of Plant and Animal Production, Kiziltepe Vocational and Training High School, Mardin Artuklu University, Mardin, Türkiye
Abstract
Triticale is an important source of protein in animal nutrition, both as grain and silage. Protein is a quality criterion that is strongly affected by the environment and genetic factors. The objectives of this study were to assess genotype–environment (G-E) interactions and determine and compare stable genotypes to recommend for further evaluation. The protein content of 12 genotypes obtained from 7 environments were evaluated using additive main effect and multiplicative interaction (AMMI) analysis in the 2014–2015 and 2015–2016 growing seasons in 4 locations in Turkey. The variance of AMMI analysis based on protein content showed a significant effect of environment, genotype and G–E interaction, with a 93.0, 2.3 and 4.5% total variation, respectively. Partitioning of the total sum of squares showed that the effect of environment was a predominant source of variation, followed by the G–E interaction and genotype effect. AMMI analysis showed that the first principal component was highly significant at P < 0.01. The mean grain protein content varied from 14.9 to 16.2% among the genotypes and from 10.9 to 18.8% among the environments. AMMI analysis indicated that G3, G12 and G1 were quite promising genotypes. G8, which was used as a variety candidate in this research, was quite stable but had a low protein value. In addition, G3, G11 and G12 had a higher protein content than the standard varieties evaluated in this research. G3 had both a high protein content and stable genotype; therefore, it can be recommended to release as a candidate. As AMMI analysis indicated, E1 and E7 environments were especially suitable for protein studies in triticale, while E4, E5 and E6 showed poor results and were not suitable environments.
Publisher
University of Life Sciences in lasi
Reference35 articles.
1. Akcura, M.; Kokten, K.; Akcacik, A.G.; Aydogan, S. Pattern analysis of Turkish bread wheat landraces and cultivars for grain and flour quality. Turkish Journal of Field Crops. 2016, 21, 120-130. https://doi.org/10.17557/tjfc.72407
2. Bilgin, O.; Balkan, A.; Korkut, Z.K.; Başer, İ. Multi-environmental evaluation of triticale, wheat and barley genotypes by GGE biplot analysis. Journal of Life Sciences. 2018, 12, 13-23. https://doi.org/10.17265/1934-7391/2018.01.002
3. Bocianowski, J.; Tratwal, A.; Nowosad, K. Genotype by environment interaction for main winter triticale varieties characteristics at two levels of technology using additive main effects and multiplicative interaction model. Euphytica. 2021, 217, 26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-020-02756-x
4. Branković-Radojčić, D.; Babić, V.; Girek, Z.; Živanović, T.; Radojčic, A.; Filipović, M.; Srdić, J. Evaluation of maize grain yield and yield stability by AMMI analysis. Genetika. 2018, 50, 1067-1080. https://doi.org/10.2298/GENSR1803067B
5. Đekić, V.; Milivojević, J.; Branković, S. The interaction of genotype and environment on yield and quality components in triticale. Biologica Nyssana. 2018, 9. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1470850