Affiliation:
1. Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences;
Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University
Abstract
The article examines the crisis of modern Western democracy. It is noted that the important causes of the crisis are slowing down of economic growth and deepening inequality in developed countries. It is shown that inter-party competition inevitably generates a mechanism of degradation of moral norms in the political sphere and reduction of the political system efficiency. These processes have intensified dramatically as a result of the spread of the Internet. They contributed to the reduction of citizens’ participation in political life and at the same time to the ochlocratization of the political system. It is shown as well that a number of transformations taking place in the Western countries are aimed at improvement of interaction mechanisms between the state and society and contribute to overcoming the crisis. These include expanding the role of parliamentary committees, increasing the number of parties, largescale reforms of public sector governance basing on collaboration. In this context, the experience of e-platforms and the possibilities of institutional collaborative platforms are analyzed. The concept of collaborative democracy is proposed, based on the analysis of the trends studied. The mechanism for collaborative democracy should ensure greater choice and broader direct participation of citizens in decision-making, control the costs of political competition and maintain ethical standards, prevent ochlocratization and improve governance. Contours of this mechanism are outlined. It is based on the use of a proportional electoral system of a special type, a system of expert councils and collaborative platforms for public decision-making, as well as on the implementation of decision-making rules close to consensus. The significance of these conclusions for Russia is discussed.
Subject
Economics and Econometrics,Finance
Reference50 articles.
1. Gontmakher E. (2019). Universal basic income: The political economic aspect. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 70—79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2019-3-70-79
2. Linde A. N. (2015). Deliberative democracy as a direction in modern democracy theory: An analysis of the main approaches. Problemnyy Analiz i Gosudarstvenno-Upravlencheskoye Proyektirovaniye, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 52—58. (In Russian).
3. Lysenko V. (2019). On the admission of political parties to participate in parliamentary elections: Foreign experience. Rossiyskiy Fond Svobodnykh Vyborov, June 24. (In Russian). http://www.rfsv.ru/education/informirovanie/o-dopuskepoliticheskikh-partii-k-uchastiiu-v-parlamentskikh-vyborakh-zarubezhnyi-opyt
4. Polterovich V. M. (2015). From social liberalism towards the philosophy of collaboration. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, No. 4, pp. 41—64. (In Russian).
5. Polterovich V. (2016). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 5—23. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-5-23
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献