Crisis of institutions of political competition, Internet and collaborative democracy

Author:

Polterovich V. M.1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Central Economics and Mathematics Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences; Moscow School of Economics, Lomonosov Moscow State University

Abstract

The article examines the crisis of modern Western democracy. It is noted that the important causes of the crisis are slowing down of economic growth and deepening inequality in developed countries. It is shown that inter-party competition inevitably generates a mechanism of degradation of moral norms in the political sphere and reduction of the political system efficiency. These processes have intensified dramatically as a result of the spread of the Internet. They contributed to the reduction of citizens’ participation in political life and at the same time to the ochlocratization of the political system. It is shown as well that a number of transformations taking place in the Western countries are aimed at improvement of interaction mechanisms between the state and society and contribute to overcoming the crisis. These include expanding the role of parliamentary committees, increasing the number of parties, largescale reforms of public sector governance basing on collaboration. In this context, the experience of e-platforms and the possibilities of institutional collaborative platforms are analyzed. The concept of collaborative democracy is proposed, based on the analysis of the trends studied. The mechanism for collaborative democracy should ensure greater choice and broader direct participation of citizens in decision-making, control the costs of political competition and maintain ethical standards, prevent ochlocratization and improve governance. Contours of this mechanism are outlined. It is based on the use of a proportional electoral system of a special type, a system of expert councils and collaborative platforms for public decision-making, as well as on the implementation of decision-making rules close to consensus. The significance of these conclusions for Russia is discussed.

Publisher

NP Voprosy Ekonomiki

Subject

Economics and Econometrics,Finance

Reference50 articles.

1. Gontmakher E. (2019). Universal basic income: The political economic aspect. Ekonomicheskaya Politika, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp. 70—79. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.18288/1994-5124-2019-3-70-79

2. Linde A. N. (2015). Deliberative democracy as a direction in modern democracy theory: An analysis of the main approaches. Problemnyy Analiz i Gosudarstvenno-Upravlencheskoye Proyektirovaniye, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 52—58. (In Russian).

3. Lysenko V. (2019). On the admission of political parties to participate in parliamentary elections: Foreign experience. Rossiyskiy Fond Svobodnykh Vyborov, June 24. (In Russian). http://www.rfsv.ru/education/informirovanie/o-dopuskepoliticheskikh-partii-k-uchastiiu-v-parlamentskikh-vyborakh-zarubezhnyi-opyt

4. Polterovich V. M. (2015). From social liberalism towards the philosophy of collaboration. Obshchestvennye Nauki i Sovremennost, No. 4, pp. 41—64. (In Russian).

5. Polterovich V. (2016). Positive collaboration: Factors and mechanisms of evolution. Voprosy Ekonomiki, No. 11, pp. 5—23. (In Russian). https://doi.org/10.32609/0042-8736-2016-11-5-23

Cited by 15 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3