Affiliation:
1. AMASYA ÜNİVERSİTESİ
2. KARADENİZ TEKNİK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
3. KARABÜK ÜNİVERSİTESİ
Abstract
In this study, taking into account the Aksu Stream data, daily total precipitation (P) and daily mean flow (Q) values were using time lagged, 8 different Rainfall-Runoff models were created and runoff value estimated for the future. The Rainfall-Runoff models have been tried with different methods and this methods performances compared for Rainfall-Runoff process. Artificial Intelligence (AI) methods, Artificial Neural Networks (ANN), Adaptive Neuro Fuzzy Inference System (ANFIS) and Heuristic Regression (HR) methods, Multivariate Adaptive Regression Splines (MARS) and Support Vector Machine (SVM) were used for describing the Rainfall-Runoff modelling. The performance of the methods is determined and compared with the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Correlation Coefficient (R) and Mean Absolute Error (MAE) coefficients. Although AI methods performance was very close, the lowest error value was obtained in the Rainfall-Runoff model created with the ANFIS method (RMSE=3.682, R=0.934, MAE=1.103). In the HR methods, the highest performance was observed on the Rainfall-Runoff model created with MARS (RMSE=3,101, R=0,952, MAE=1,302). In the performance evaluation, it was seen that HR methods have higher performance than AI methods for modelling Rainfall-Runoff process.
Publisher
Omer Halisdemir Universitesi
Subject
General Economics, Econometrics and Finance
Reference22 articles.
1. [1] Hughes, D., Greenwood, P., Coulson, G., & Blair, G. (2006, June). Gridstix: Supporting flood prediction using embedded hardware and next generation grid middleware. International Symposium on a World of Wireless, Mobile and Multimedia Networks (WoWMoM'06) (pp. 6-pp), 2006.
2. [2] Tokar, A. S., ve Johnson, P. A. 1999. Rainfall-runoff modeling using artificial neural networks. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 4(3), 232-239.
3. [3] T. Mishra, P. K., & Karmakar, S. (2019). Performance of optimum neural network in rainfall–runoff modeling over a river basin. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 16(3), 1289-1302.
4. [4] Yüksek, Ö., Babacan, H. T., & Saka, F. (2018). Yağış-akış modellemesinde optimum yapay sinir ağı yapısının araştırılması. Türk Hidrolik Dergisi, 2(1), 31-37.
5. [5] Ashrafi, M., Chua, L. H., & Quek, C. (2019). The applicability of Generic Self-Evolving Takagi-Sugeno-Kang neuro-fuzzy model in modeling rainfall–runoff and river routing. Hydrology Research, 50(4), 991-1001.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献