Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Arts, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic
2. Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic
3. Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic
Abstract
This paper endeavours to deliver a comprehensive spatial depiction of Slovakia’s presidential election held on 16th and 30th March 2019. At first, the text briefly considers electoral and institutional framework of presidential elections and its background. Within the context of the first round, the paper subsequently analyses the electoral support of four key candidates who had obtained at least 10 per cent in order to clarify the overall electoral support. At the municipal level, the analysis of aggregated data then brings a complex mapping of regional electoral support towards the presidential candidates. Our negative binomial regression models, based on socio-economic variables and the results of the 2016 parliamentary election, yield no satisfactory results. Nonetheless, among others, it was revealed that the final two contenders did not lose their voters from the previous round. In comparison to Šefčovič, Čaputová succeeded in acquiring lower levels of new electoral support (up to 20 per cent) but across the whole country. Afterwards, the Hungarian minority was proved a determinative factor for the win, contrarily to the socio-economic indicators as explicative variables of which the university degree and age were found the most significant.
Publisher
Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Saints Cyril and Methodius
Reference75 articles.
1. APPLEBAUM, A. (2019). Slovakia’s president suggests way out world’s populist quagmire. In: The Washington Post, 15 October 2020 [online]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/15/slovakias-president-suggests-way-out-worlds-populist-quagmire/. [Accessed July 23, 2020].
2. APPLEBAUM, A. (2020). Twilight of democracy: The seductive lure of authoritarianism. New York: Doubleday, 2020, 208 pp.
3. ALLISON, P., WATERMAN, R. P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. In: Sociological Methodology, Vol. 32, 2002, pp. 247–265.
4. ÁGH, A. (2016a). The decline of democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the worst-case scenario. In: Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 63, No. 5–6, 2016, pp. 277–287.
5. ÁGH, A. (2016b). The deconsolidation of democracy in East-Central Europe: The new world order and the EU´s geopolitical crisis. In: Politics in Central Europe, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2016, pp. 7–36.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献