Where Were the Voters? A Spatial Analysis of the 2019 Slovak Presidential Election

Author:

Zvada Ľubomír1ORCID,Petlach Martin2ORCID,Ondruška Michal3ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculty of Arts, Palacký University in Olomouc, Czech Republic

2. Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies, Mendel University in Brno, Czech Republic

3. Faculty of Social Sciences, Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic

Abstract

This paper endeavours to deliver a comprehensive spatial depiction of Slovakia’s presidential election held on 16th and 30th March 2019. At first, the text briefly considers electoral and institutional framework of presidential elections and its background. Within the context of the first round, the paper subsequently analyses the electoral support of four key candidates who had obtained at least 10 per cent in order to clarify the overall electoral support. At the municipal level, the analysis of aggregated data then brings a complex mapping of regional electoral support towards the presidential candidates. Our negative binomial regression models, based on socio-economic variables and the results of the 2016 parliamentary election, yield no satisfactory results. Nonetheless, among others, it was revealed that the final two contenders did not lose their voters from the previous round. In comparison to Šefčovič, Čaputová succeeded in acquiring lower levels of new electoral support (up to 20 per cent) but across the whole country. Afterwards, the Hungarian minority was proved a determinative factor for the win, contrarily to the socio-economic indicators as explicative variables of which the university degree and age were found the most significant.

Publisher

Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Saints Cyril and Methodius

Reference75 articles.

1. APPLEBAUM, A. (2019). Slovakia’s president suggests way out world’s populist quagmire. In: The Washington Post, 15 October 2020 [online]. Available at: https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2019/10/15/slovakias-president-suggests-way-out-worlds-populist-quagmire/. [Accessed July 23, 2020].

2. APPLEBAUM, A. (2020). Twilight of democracy: The seductive lure of authoritarianism. New York: Doubleday, 2020, 208 pp.

3. ALLISON, P., WATERMAN, R. P. (2002). Fixed-effects negative binomial regression models. In: Sociological Methodology, Vol. 32, 2002, pp. 247–265.

4. ÁGH, A. (2016a). The decline of democracy in East-Central Europe: Hungary as the worst-case scenario. In: Problems of Post-Communism, Vol. 63, No. 5–6, 2016, pp. 277–287.

5. ÁGH, A. (2016b). The deconsolidation of democracy in East-Central Europe: The new world order and the EU´s geopolitical crisis. In: Politics in Central Europe, Vol. 12, No. 3, 2016, pp. 7–36.

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3