Affiliation:
1. Political Science Department at the Budapest Corvinus University Hungary
2. Research Centre “Together for Europe” Hungary
3. Central European Political Science Association (CEPSA), Hungary
Abstract
Abstract
In recent decades, the most remarkable feature of East-Central European (ECE) states has been their engagement in a deconsolidation process that necessitates the reconceptualising of European Studies and the theory of democracy. In the early ’90s, during the “revolution of high expectations,” consolidation was the key term in the conceptual framework of the transitology paradigm, but this approach was questioned increasingly in the 2000s and rejected in the 2010s. In its place, deconsolidation was introduced as one of a wide array of similar terms referring to the decline, backsliding or regression of democracy and later as one of a whole “other” family of opposite terms like (semi-)authoritarian system and competitive/elected autocracy. Indeed, rather than a transition to democracy, a tendency to transition to authoritarian rule has been observed in the ECE states in general and in Poland and Hungary in particular. In the last quarter century, the twin terms of Europeanisation and democratisation, which denote normative approaches, have been the main conceptual pillars of analyses of the ECE states. It turns out, however, that the opposite processes of de-Europeanisation and de-democratisation can now also be observed in these countries.
Subject
Political Science and International Relations,Sociology and Political Science
Reference69 articles.
1. Aniol, Wlodzimierz (2015): A Social Deficit: Poland in the Face of Developmental Challenges in the 2010s. Problems of Social Policy (Warsaw) 31 (4): 39-56.
2. Ágh, Attila (2015a): De-Europeanization and de-Democratization trends in ECE: From the Potemkin democracy to the elected autocracy in Hungary. Journal of Comparative Politics 8 (2): 4-26.
3. Ágh, Attila (2015b): The Triple Crisis in the New Member States: The historical trajectory of NMS-8 in the Past Quarter Century. Southeastern Europe 39 (3): 294-317.
4. Ágh, Attila (2015c): Radical party system changes in five East-Central European states: Eurosceptic and populist parties on the move in the 2010s. Baltic Journal of Political Science 4 (4): 23-48.
5. Ágh, Attila (2016a) “The increasing core-periphery divide and the new member states: Diverging from the European Union’s mainstream developments,”117-129, in Magone et al., eds.: Core-periphery Relations in the European Union, London and New York: Routledge, 332.
Cited by
16 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献