Supporting a Decision for Informal Settlements Development using the Analytical Network Process

Author:

Zakaria Eraqi Ayman M.1,Hamed Issa Usama2,A. A. Elminiawy Mary1

Affiliation:

1. Architecture Department, faculty of fine arts, Minia University, Egypt

2. Civil Engineering Department, Faculty of Engineering, Minia University, Egypt and Civil Engineering Department, College of Engineering, Taif University, Saudi Arabia

Abstract

Developing informal settlements has become an important issue for improving urban structures in developing countries. An Informal Settlements Development Fund (ISDF) was presented to Egypt for supporting urban, economic, social and environmental plans. Development plans do not clearly take into account population priorities or satisfaction criteria. Furthermore, evaluating several alternatives was based on usual statistical methods that cannot deal with multiple criteria or complex problems, leading to imprecise results. Nowadays, adding value to the developed area, restoring cost, and studying social and economic plan impacts on the population, represent high priorities. In this study, a model concerns the optimal decision evaluation for multi-criteria in informal settlements development was proposed. Five clusters (criteria) were identified and included the efficiencies of urban structure, economic, social, and environmental, in addition to population satisfaction. Twenty one internal factors represented in nods were categorized under the five clusters and affecting proposed four alternatives. The model depended on the Analytic Network Process (ANP) technique which is used to support multi-criteria decision making. ANP was selected for its capability to deal with complex problems, create dependencies and feedbacks as well as use the relative weights of all interactions. This technique confirms a logical decision and accurate prediction amongst numerous alternatives. The model was validated and applied to an informal settlements area as a case study in Egypt. The results supported to use first alternative by 38.20%, while the ISDF results selected the third alternative. Moreover, the detailed analysis emphasized that the first alternative was more balanced between the social elements and the direct economic requirements of the population, while the third alternative tended to achieve restoring cost despite its negative social effects. Lastly, the proposed model can be used appropriately in similar cases to improve informal settlements.

Publisher

Technoscience Academy

Subject

General Medicine

Reference31 articles.

1. MARWAN, L. M.; ELQTQAT, H. R. Informal areas in the Governorates of the Arab Republic of Egypt, Analytical Study of the Current Situation and Different Methods of Dealing, Part I. Cairo. 2008.

2. INFORMAL SETTLEMENTS DEVELOPMENT FUND. Reference Guide - Preparation of a work plan for the development of an informal area project. cairo. 2008.

3. KAMALIPOUR, H.; DOVEY, K. Mapping the visibility of informal settlements. Habitat International, p. 63-75,Vol.85, 2019.

4. ABUNYEWAH, M.; THAYAPARAN, G.; KIM, M. Profiling Informal Settlements for Disaster Risks. Procedia Engineering, p. 238-245, Vol.212, 2018.

5. MONTOYA, J.; CARTES, I.; ZUINELZU, A. Indicators for evaluating sustainability in Bogota's informal settlements: Definition and valdation. Sustainable Cities and Society, p. 101896,Vol.53, 2020.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3