How the Lack of Content Validity in the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy Is Undermining Quality Physical Education

Author:

Dudley Dean123ORCID,Cairney John2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Macquarie School of Education, Faculty of Arts, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia

2. School of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, Faculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD, Australia

3. Centre of Educational Measurement and Assessment, Sydney School of Education and Social Work, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia

Abstract

Since 2015, the United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization has posited physical literacy as a central tenet and pedagogical reform initiative of quality physical education. An assessment of physical literacy is, therefore, becoming an increasingly important aspect of physical education in schools. Internal and external threats to assessment instrument validity are always important considerations in assessment tool development, but this paper identifies why particular attention needs to be paid to the content validity of one such instrument being used by physical educators and researchers. Specifically, this paper interrogates the content validity claims of the Canadian Assessment of Physical Literacy—Version 2 and discusses why greater attention needs to be paid to the content validity of this instrument if pedagogical reform in physical education is not to be undermined.

Publisher

Human Kinetics

Subject

Education,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation,Orthopedics and Sports Medicine

Reference66 articles.

1. Does washback exist?;Alderson, J.C.,1993

2. Standards for educational and psychological testing,2014

3. Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome);Biggs, J.B.,1982

4. Feasibility, validity, and reliability of the plank isometric hold as a field-based assessment of torso muscular endurance for children 8–12 years of age;Boyer, C.,2013

5. Physical literacy profiles are associated with differences in children’s physical activity participation: A latent profile analysis approach;Brown, D.M.,2020

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3