Affiliation:
1. Department of Civil and Transport Engineering, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim/PNC Norge, Norway
Abstract
Understanding how to systemise, organise, and finance the design, construction, operation, and maintenance activities are all parameters needed to be optimised simultaneously in a Project Delivery Method. To meet the challenges of increasingly complex projects, a new class of delivery methods is emerging. These methods are often labelled “collaborative” since they seek to align the client’s interest with those of the supply chain. The purpose of this article is to present the current state-of-the-art through a review of 156 identified articles concerning Partnering, Integrated Project Delivery, Alliancing, Relational Contracting, and Relationship-Based Procurement. A framework for the methodological procedure based on the state of the art within qualitative research was elaborated and is reported on in this paper. The results show that there is a range of research on collaborative project delivery methods across the world. By analysing the study purposes, important themes generated and delineated as a) Conceptualisation, b) Implementation and experiences, c) Pros & Cons, d) Building Partnership & Social Dimensions, and e) Performance and Success. The paper provides an overview of collaborative project delivery methods identified in the realm of academic journals. Secondly, knowledge gaps have been identified by creating a summary of the body of evidence.
Publisher
Vilnius Gediminas Technical University
Subject
Strategy and Management,Civil and Structural Engineering
Reference205 articles.
1. Aarseth, W., Andersen, B., Ahola, T., & Jergeas, G. (2012). Practical difficulties encountered in attempting to implement a partnering approach. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 5(2), 266-284. https://doi.org/10.1108/17538371211214941
2. Alderman, N., & Ivory, C. (2007). Partnering in major contracts: Paradox and metaphor. International Journal of Project Management, 25(4), 386-393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2007.01.002
3. Alhazmi, T., & McCaffer, R. (2000). Project procurement system selection model. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 126(3), 176-184. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9364(2000)126:3(176)
4. Ali, A.-S., Mohd-Don, Z., Alias, A., Kamaruzzaman, S.-N., & Pitt, M. (2010). The performance of construction partnering projects in Malaysia. International Journal of Physical Sciences, 5(4), 327-333.
5. American Society of Civil Engineers. (1997). Project delivery systems. In Quality in the Constructed Project.
Cited by
46 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献