MEDIATION AS AN ALTERNATIVE MEANS TO THE BUSINESS DISPUTE RESOLUTION

Author:

Trinkūnienė Eva1,Trinkūnas Vaidotas2ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Law, Faculty of Business Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

2. Department of Construction Economics and Property Management, Vilnius Gediminas Technical University, Saulėtekio al. 11, 10223 Vilnius, Lithuania

Abstract

In business, disputes often arise over contractual relationships when contractual obligations are not properly fulfilled. The potential risk of disputes must always be assessed. Timing and adherence to agreed deadlines are very important in business, as any delay can cause significant damage, and the legal entity can suffer significant losses. In a dispute between business partners, people tend to go to the court and fight there to the fullest rather than reach an amicable settlement, but there is always a winning and losing party in a litigation. From a long-term perspective, it will be impossible for the disputing parties to work together in the future, and the losing party will always feel great resentment towards the winner. Therefore, litigation is not always an attractive option and in this case mediation is a great way to resolve business disputes due to its expediency. Mediation is a dynamic, structured, interactive process which is focused on the needs, rights, and interests of the parties. It also helps to find the optimal solution and encourages open communication. This article presents the possibilities and perspectives of the application of mediation in Lithuania by reviewing global practice.

Publisher

Vilnius Gediminas Technical University

Reference28 articles.

1. Birke, R., & Teitz, L. (2002). U.S. Mediation in 2001: The path that brought America to Uniform Laws and mediation in cyberspace. American Journal of Comparative Law Supplement, 50, 181-214. https://doi.org/10.2307/840876

2. Carnevale, P. J., & Choi, D.-W. (2000). Culture in the mediation of International Disputes. International Journal of Psychology, 35(2), 105-110. https://doi.org/10.1080/002075900399394

3. European code of conduct for mediators. (2004). Civil justice. http://ec.europa.eu/civiljustice/adr/adr_ec_code_conduct_en.pdf

4. European Parliament and the Council (2008). Directive 2008/52/EC of 21 May 2008 on certain aspects of mediation in civil and commercial matters. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/GA/TXT/?uri=CELEX:32008L0052

5. Fortune Law. (2020, January 15). Business disputes: Commercial dispute resolution solicitors. https://www.fortunelaw.com/business-legal-services/commercial-dispute-resolutionsolicitors/

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3