Abstract
AbstractThe ESS$$\nu $$νSB project proposes to base a neutrino “Super Beam” of unprecedented luminosity at the European Spallation Source. The original proposal identified the second peak of the oscillation probability as the optimal to maximize the discovery potential to leptonic CP violation. However this choice reduces the statistics at the detector and penalizes other complementary searches such as the determination of the atmospheric oscillation parameters, particularly the octant of $$\theta _{23}$$θ23 as well as the neutrino mass ordering. We explore how these shortcomings can be alleviated by the combination of the beam data with the atmospheric neutrino sample that would also be collected at the detector. We find that the combination not only improves very significantly these drawbacks, but also enhances both the CP violation discovery potential and the precision in the measurement of the CP violating phase, for which the facility was originally optimized, by lifting parametric degeneracies. We then reassess the optimization of the ESS$$\nu $$νSB setup when the atmospheric neutrino sample is considered, with an emphasis in performing a measurement of the CP violating phase as precise as possible. We find that for the presently preferred value of $$\delta \sim -\pi /2$$δ∼-π/2, shorter baselines and longer running time in neutrino mode would be optimal. In these conditions, a measurement better than $$14^\circ $$14∘ would be achievable for any value of the $$\theta _{23}$$θ23 octant and the mass ordering. Conversely, if present and next generation facilities were not able to discover CP violation, longer baselines and more even splitting between neutrino and neutrino modes would be preferable. These choices would allow a $$5 \sigma $$5σ discovery of CP violation for around a $$60\%$$60% of the possible values of $$\delta $$δ and to determine its value with a precision around $$6^\circ $$6∘ if it is close to 0 or $$\pi $$π.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Subject
Physics and Astronomy (miscellaneous),Engineering (miscellaneous)
Reference87 articles.
1. DAYA-BAY Collaboration Collaboration, F. An et al., Observation of electron-antineutrino disappearance at Daya Bay. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 171803 (2012). arXiv:1203.1669
2. RENO collaboration Collaboration, J. Ahn et al., Observation of reactor electron antineutrino disappearance in the RENO experiment. Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 191802 (2012). arXiv:1204.0626
3. Double Chooz Collaboration Collaboration, Y. Abe et al., Reactor electron antineutrino disappearance in the Double Chooz experiment, Phys. Rev. D 86, 052008 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.86.052008. arXiv:1207.6632
4. MINOS Collaboration Collaboration, P. Adamson et al., Improved search for muon–neutrino to electron–neutrino oscillations in MINOS. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 181802 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.181802. arXiv:1108.0015
5. T2K Collaboration Collaboration, K. Abe et al., Indication of electron neutrino appearance from an accelerator-produced off-axis muon neutrino beam. Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 041801 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.107.041801. arXiv:1106.2822
Cited by
22 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献