A Global Phylogenomic Study of the Thelypteridaceae

Author:

Fawcett Susan1,Smith Alan R.2,Sundue Michael1,Burleigh J. Gordon3,Sessa Emily B.3,Kuo Li-Yaung4,Chen Cheng-Wei5,Testo Weston L.1,Kessler Michael6,Consortium GoFlag3,Barrington David S.1

Affiliation:

1. 1Pringle Herbarium, Department of Plant Biology, University of Vermont, 111 Jeffords Hall, 63 Carrigan Dr., Bington, Vermont 05401, USA

2. 3University Herbarium, University of California, 1001 Valley Life Sciences Bldg., Berkeley, California 94720-2465, USA

3. 4Department of Biology, University of Florida, 220 Bartram Hall, Gainesville, Florida 32611-8525, USA

4. 5Institute of Molecular & Cellular Biology, National Tsing Hua University, No. 101, Section 2, Kuang-Fu Road, Hsinchu, Taiwan

5. 6Independent researcher, Keelung 202, Taiwan

6. 7Department of Systematic & Evolutionary Botany, University of Zurich, Zollikerstrasse 107, CH-8008, Zurich, Switzerland

Abstract

Abstract— The generic classification of the Thelypteridaceae has been the subject of much controversy. Proposed taxonomic systems have varied from recognizing the approximately 1200 species in the family within the single genus Thelypteris, to systems favoring upwards of 30 genera. Insights on intrafamilial relationships, especially for neotropical taxa, have been gained from recent phylogenetic studies; however, in the most recent classification, 10 of 30 recognized genera are either non-monophyletic or untested. We sequenced 407 nuclear loci for 621 samples, representing all recognized genera and approximately half the known species diversity. These were analyzed using both maximum likelihood analysis of a concatenated matrix and multi-species coalescent methods. Our phylogenomic results, informed by recently published morphological evidence, provide the foundation for a generic classification which recircumscribed 14 genera and recognized seven new genera. The 37 monophyletic genera sampled demonstrate greater geographic coherence than previous taxonomic concepts suggested. Additionally, our results demonstrate that certain morphological characters, such as frond division, are evolutionarily labile and are thus inadequate for defining genera.

Publisher

American Society of Plant Taxonomists

Subject

Plant Science,Genetics,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3