Instructors’ Perceptions of Authentic Assessment to Competences Acquisition among Undergraduate Prospective Science Teachers in Tanzania

Author:

Nyinge BarakaORCID

Abstract

Authentic assessment is perceived differently by instructors about competence acquisition. Sometimes instructors perceive authentic assessment positively but when it comes to the implementation process they do not do it accordingly implying negative perception. The study involved six (6) instructors from two higher education institutions in Tanzania. The two institutions included; the College of Natural and Mathematics Sciences at the University of Dodoma and Mkwawa University College of Education, a constituent College of the University of Dar es Salaam. Data were collected by using semi-structured interviews and analysed thematically. The findings showed that instructors differed in perceptions in terms of the authentic assessment tools used. Instructors in education courses insisted on the use of portfolios, seminar presentation and microteaching as authentic assessment tools. Those in science subjects namely biology and chemistry insisted on the use of practical work and projects as authentic assessment tools. The use of authentic assessment tools was perceived to be both formative and summative though summative use appeared to be dominant. The competences which were perceived by instructors to be acquired from authentic assessment tools included content, pedagogical, and generic competences. The study is concluded by calling for clear policies on authentic assessment for all instructors to have a common perception on their uses concerning competences acquisition.

Publisher

AMO Publisher

Reference35 articles.

1. Aliningsih, F., & Sofwan, A. (2015). English teachers’ perceptions and practices of authentic assessment. Language Circle : Journal of Language and Literature, 10(1), 19–27.

2. Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Sorensen, C. (2010). Introduction to research in education (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.

3. Ayubi, S. Al, Erlina, D., & Desvitasari, D. (2021). English Teachers’ Perception on the Use of Authentic Assessment in EFL Classroom at MA Al-Fatah Palembang. Jadila: Journal of Development and Innovation in Language and Literature Education, 2(1), 73–87. https://doi.org/10.52690/jadila.v2i1.185

4. Bloxham, S., & Boyd, P. (2007). Developing Effective Assessment in Higher Education: a practical guide. McGraw-Hill Education.

5. Broadbent, J., Panadero, E., & Bouda, D. (2018). Implementing summative assessment with a formative flavour: A case study in a large class. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(2), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2017.1343455

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3