Assessing farm biosecurity and farmers' knowledge and practices concerning antibiotics and antibiotic resistance in poultry and pig farms in Southern Togo
-
Published:2022-07-21
Issue:
Volume:
Page:1727-1737
-
ISSN:2231-0916
-
Container-title:Veterinary World
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:Vet World
Author:
Bedekelabou Andre Pouwedeou1ORCID, Talaki Essodina2ORCID, Dzogbema Koffi Francois-Xavier3ORCID, Dolou Malibida2ORCID, Savadogo Madi4ORCID, Orou Seko Malik1ORCID, Bada Alambedji Rianatou1ORCID
Affiliation:
1. Department of Public Health and Environment, Inter-States School of Veterinary Sciences and Medicine of Dakar (EISMV), P.O. Box 5077, Dakar, Senegal. 2. Higher School of Agronomy (ESA) of the University of Lomé, Togo; Regional Center of Excellence on Avian Sciences (CERSA) of the University of Lomé, Togo. 3. Regional Center of Excellence on Avian Sciences (CERSA) of the University of Lomé, Togo. 4. Department of Biomedical and Public Health, Research Institute for Health Sciences (IRSS/CNRST), P.O. Box 7047, Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso; Fundamental and Applied Research for Animals and Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Liege, Quartier Vallée 2 avenue de Cureghem, 6, 4000 Liege, Belgium.
Abstract
ackground and Aim: Several factors contribute to the unusual incidence of antibiotic resistance, which is now a primary public health concern. However, failure in managing preventive and therapeutic antibiotic use on farms is one of the most crucial factors. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the biosecurity of farms, farmers' competence, and practices related to antibiotics and their resistance in poultry and pig rearing in Togo.
Materials and Methods: Through a cross-sectional survey, 121 commercial poultry farmers and 97 commercial pig farmers were questioned to evaluate the biosecurity of farms and farmers' competence and practices related to antibiotics and antibiotic resistance. Descriptive analyses, including the evaluation of proportions, were carried out. In addition, results from qualitative factors were evaluated in a defined grid and totaled up to assess cleanliness measures, awareness, and behavior regarding antibiotics and their resistance.
Results: The results demonstrated that most farmers working on poultry farms had a university education, while most working on pig farms had secondary education. Most poultry (69%) and pig (44%) farms were of small sizes (<1000 animals in poultry and <10 animals in pig farming). The footbaths were used in just 51% of poultry farms and 4% of pig farms, respectively, with 37% and 82% of poultry and pig farms having inadequate levels of hygiene. In poultry farms, respiratory issues and periodic decline in egg-laying were the main problems. Simultaneously, skin disorders (scabies) and plagues (African swine fever) were the primary health constraints in pig farming. Tetracycline is the most commonly used antibiotic by farmers. However, in poultry and pig farms, 21% and 67% of farmers were unaware of antibiotics. In addition, 39% and 57% were unaware of antibiotic resistance. Poultry and pig farmers' competence were substantially linked to their education level. Poultry farmers demonstrated better practices, including procuring antibiotics based on veterinary prescriptions (63%) and they knew where antibiotics should be bought (90%). Nevertheless, 43% of farmers asserted unpleasant activities – no application for laboratory testing (93%) and use of antibiotics for prevention (82%). In pig farming, most farmers (69%) reported inadequate incidents of the use of antibiotics.
Conclusion: This study identified a crucial non-compliance with biosecurity measures and good practices toward antibiotic use on many farms. Therefore, training of farmers is mandatory for safe livestock products.
Publisher
Veterinary World
Subject
General Veterinary
Reference29 articles.
1. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2011) Mapping Supply and Demand for Animal-source Foods to 2030. Animal Production and Health Working Paper. No. 2. p1–154. Available from: http://www.fao.org/3/i2425e/i2425e00.pdf . Retrieved on 27-06-2022. 2. Schar, D., Sommanustweechai, A., Laxminarayan, R. and Tangcharoensathien, V. (2018) Surveillance of antimicrobial consumption in animal production sectors of low-and middle-income countries: Optimizing use and addressing antimicrobial resistance. PLoS Med., 15(3): e1002521. 3. Van Boeckel, T.P., Brower, C., Gilbert, M., Grenfell, B.T., Levin, S.A., Robinson, T.P., Teillant, A. and Laxminarayan, R. (2015) Global trends in antimicrobial use in food animals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 112(18): 5649–5654. 4. Landers, T.F., Cohen, B., Wittum, T.E. and Larson, E.L. (2012) A review of antibiotic use in food animals: Perspective, policy, and potential. Public Health Rep., 127(1): 4–22. 5. Van, T.T.H., Yidana, Z., Smooker, P.M. and Coloe, P.J. (2020) Antibiotic use in food animals worldwide, with a focus on Africa: Pluses and minuses. J. Glob. Antimicrob. Resist., 20 : 170–177.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
|
|