An Integrated Process for Co-Developing and Implementing Written and Computable Clinical Practice Guidelines

Author:

Matson-Koffman Dyann M.1,Robinson Susan J.1,Jakhmola Priya1,Fochtmann Laura J.2,Willett DuWayne3,Lubin Ira M.1,Burton Matthew M.4,Tailor Amrita1,Pitts Dana L.1,Casey Donald E.5,Opelka Frank G.6,Mullins Ryan7,Elder Randy1,Michaels Maria1

Affiliation:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)

2. Department of Psychiatry, Pharmacological Sciences and Biomedical Informatics, Stony Brook University

3. Department of Internal Medicine’s Division of Cardiology at University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center

4. Holistic Healthcare Solutions, LLC

5. Department of Internal Medicine, Rush Medical College, Jefferson College of Population Health, Institute for Healthcare Informatics, University of Minnesota

6. American College of Surgeons

7. Cerner Corporation

Abstract

The goal of this article is to describe an integrated parallel process for the co-development of written and computable clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) to accelerate adoption and increase the impact of guideline recommendations in clinical practice. From February 2018 through December 2021, interdisciplinary work groups were formed after an initial Kaizen event and using expert consensus and available literature, produced a 12-phase integrated process (IP). The IP includes activities, resources, and iterative feedback loops for developing, implementing, disseminating, communicating, and evaluating CPGs. The IP incorporates guideline standards and informatics practices and clarifies how informaticians, implementers, health communicators, evaluators, and clinicians can help guideline developers throughout the development and implementation cycle to effectively co-develop written and computable guidelines. More efficient processes are essential to create actionable CPGs, disseminate and communicate recommendations to clinical end users, and evaluate CPG performance. Pilot testing is underway to determine how this IP expedites the implementation of CPGs into clinical practice and improves guideline uptake and health outcomes.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference55 articles.

1. How much effort is needed to keep up with the literature relevant for primary care?;Alper;J Med Libr Assoc,2004

2. Textual guidelines versus computable guidelines: a comparative study in the framework of the PRESGUID project in order to appreciate the impact of guideline format on physician compliance.;Dufour;AMIA Annu Symp Proc,2006

3. From practice guidelines to clinical decision support: closing the loop.;Fox;J R Soc Med,2009

4. Clinicians’ attitudes and perceived barriers and facilitators to cancer treatment clinical practice guideline adherence: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative literature.;Bierbaum;Implement Sci,2020

5. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? a framework for improvement.;Cabana;JAMA,1999

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3