Adapted Kaizen: Multi-Organizational Complex Process Redesign for Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age

Author:

Michaels Maria1,Hangsleben Mindy234,Sherwood Amy3,Skapik Julia5,Larsen Kevin67

Affiliation:

1. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA

2. Former HHS Entrepreneur-in-Residence (Lean Innovation Fellow), US Department of Health and Human Services – Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC), Washington, DC

3. Former HHS Entrepreneur-in-Residence (Lean Innovation Fellow), US Department of Health and Human Services – Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS): Quality Measurement and Health Assessment Group, Baltimore, MD

4. Varyn Consulting LLC, Saint Louis Park, MN

5. National Association of Community Health Centers, Bethesda, MD

6. Optum, Eden Prairie, MN

7. University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN

Abstract

The need for a method to examine complex, multidisciplinary processes involving many diverse organizations initially led multiple US federal agencies to adopt the traditional Kaizen, a Lean process improvement method typically used within a single organization, to encompass multiple organizations each with its own leadership and priorities. First, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Office of the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology adapted Kaizen to federal agency processes for the development of electronic clinical quality measures. Later, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) further modified this adapted Kaizen during its Adapting Clinical Guidelines for the Digital Age (ACG) initiative, which aimed to improve the broader scope of guideline development and implementation. This is a methods article to document the adapted Kaizen method for future use in similar complex processes, illustrating how to apply the adapted Kaizen through CDC’s ACG initiative and showing the reach achieved by using the adapted Kaizen method. The adapted Kaizen includes pre-Kaizen planning, a Kaizen event, and post-Kaizen implementation that accommodate multidisciplinary and multi-organizational participation. ACG included 5 workgroups that each developed products to support their respective scope: Guideline Creation, Informatics Framework, Translation and Implementation, Communication and Dissemination, and Evaluation. Despite challenges gathering diverse perspectives and balancing the competing priorities of multiple organizations, the ACG participants produced interrelated standards, processes, and tools—further described in separate publications—that programs and partners have leveraged. Use of a siloed approach may not have supported the development and dissemination of these products.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Health Policy

Reference24 articles.

1. Managing clinical knowledge for health care improvement.;Balas;Yearb Med Inform,2000

2. The current research to evidence-based practice time gap is now 15 instead of 17 years: urgent action is needed.;Melnyk;Worldviews Evid Based Nurs,2021

3. Textual guidelines versus computable guidelines: a comparative study in the framework of the PRESGUID project in order to appreciate the impact of guideline format on physician compliance [Published online 2006].;Dufour;AMIA Annu Symp Proc,2006

4. From practice guidelines to clinical decision support: Closing the loop.;Fox;J R Soc Med,2009

5. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement.;Cabana;JAMA,1999

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3