Anesthesiology Trainees Face Ethical, Practical, and Relational Challenges in Obtaining Informed Consent

Author:

Waisel David B.1,Lamiani Giulia2,Sandrock Norma J.3,Pascucci Robert4,Truog Robert D.5,Meyer Elaine C.6

Affiliation:

1. Associate Professor of Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, and Senior Associate in Anesthesia, Children's Hospital Boston.

2. Fulbright Scholar, Institute for Professionalism and Ethical Practice, Children's Hospital Boston. Research Fellow and Chair of Medical Psychology, San Paolo Hospital, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

3. Instructor in Anaesthesia, Harvard Medical School, and Attending Anesthesiologist, Department of Anesthesia, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts.

4. Assistant Professor of Anaesthesia (Pediatrics), Harvard Medical School, and Senior Associate in Anesthesia and Critical Care, Children's Hospital Boston.

5. Professor, Department of Anesthesia and Medical Ethics, Harvard Medical School, and Director, Institute for Professionalism and Ethical Practice, Children's Hospital Boston.

6. Associate Professor, Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, and Associate Director, Institute for Professionalism and Ethical Practice, Children's Hospital Boston.

Abstract

Background Categorizing difficulties anesthesiologists have in obtaining informed consent may influence education, performance, and research. This study investigated the trainees' perspectives and educational needs through a qualitative analysis of narratives. Methods The Program to Enhance Relational and Communication Skills-Anesthesia used professional actors to teach communication skills and relational abilities associated with informed consent. Before attending the program, participants wrote about a challenging informed consent experience. Narratives were analyzed by two researchers following the principles of grounded theory. The researchers independently read the narratives and marked key words and phrases to identify reoccurring challenges described by anesthesiologists. Through rereading of the narratives and discussion, the two researchers reached consensus on the challenges that arose and calculated their frequency. Results Analysis of the 39 narratives led to the identification of three types of challenges facing anesthesiologists in obtaining informed consent. Ethical challenges included patient wishes not honored, conflict between patient and family wishes and medical judgment, patient decision-making capacity, and upholding professional standards. Practical challenges included the amount of information to provide, communication barriers, and time limitations. Relational challenges included questions about trainee competence, mistrust associated with previous negative experiences, and misunderstandings between physician and patient or family. Conclusions The ethical, practical, and relational challenges in obtaining informed consent colored trainees' views of patient care and affected their interactions with patients. Using participant narratives personalizes education and motivates participants. The richness of narratives may help anesthesiologists to appreciate the qualitative aspects of informed consent.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference25 articles.

Cited by 32 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3