Compassionate and Clinical Behavior of Residents in a Simulated Informed Consent Encounter

Author:

Waisel David B.1,Ruben Mollie A.1,Blanch-Hartigan Danielle1,Hall Judith A.1,Meyer Elaine C.1,Blum Richard H.1

Affiliation:

1. From the Departments of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine (D.B.W., E.C.M., R.H.B.) and Psychiatry (E.C.M.), Boston Children’s Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Psychology, Northeastern University (J.A.H.), Boston, Massachusetts; the Department of Psychology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine (M.A.R.); and the Department of Natural and App

Abstract

Abstract Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New Background Compassionate behavior in clinicians is described as seeking to understand patients’ psychosocial, physical and medical needs, timely attending to these needs, and involving patients as they desire. The goal of our study was to evaluate compassionate behavior in patient interactions, pain management, and the informed consent process of anesthesia residents in a simulated preoperative evaluation of a patient in pain scheduled for urgent surgery. Methods Forty-nine Clinical Anesthesia residents in year 1 and 16 Clinical Anesthesia residents in year 3 from three residency programs individually obtained informed consent for anesthesia for an urgent laparotomy from a standardized patient complaining of pain. Encounters were assessed for ordering pain medication, for patient-resident interactions by using the Empathic Communication Coding System to code responses to pain and nausea cues, and for the content of the informed consent discussion. Results Of the 65 residents, 56 (86%) ordered pain medication, at an average of 4.2 min (95% CI, 3.2 to 5.1) into the encounter; 9 (14%) did not order pain medication. Resident responses to the cues averaged between perfunctory recognition and implicit recognition (mean, 1.7 [95% CI, 1.6 to 1.9]) in the 0 (less empathic) to 6 (more empathic) system. Responses were lower for residents who did not order pain medication (mean, 1.2 [95% CI, 0.8 to 1.6]) and similar for those who ordered medication before informed consent signing (mean, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.1]) and after signing (mean, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.6 to 2.0]; F (2, 62) = 4.21; P = 0.019; partial η2 = 0.120). There were significant differences between residents who ordered pain medication before informed consent and those who did not order pain medication and between residents who ordered pain medication after informed consent signing and those who did not. Conclusions In a simulated preoperative evaluation, anesthesia residents have variable and, at times, flawed recognition of patient cues, responsiveness to patient cues, pain management, and patient interactions.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference48 articles.

1. The anesthesiology milestone project.;J Grad Med Educ,2014

2. American Board of Anesthesiology: American Board of Anesthesiology Applied Examination: Objective Structured Clinical Examination, Content Outline. Available at: http://www.theaba.org/PDFs/APPLIED-Exam/APPLIED-OSCE-ContentOutline. Published 2017. Accessed June 1, 2018.

3. Compassion training in healthcare: What are patients’ perspectives on training healthcare providers?;BMC Med Educ,2016

4. Compassion: a scoping review of the healthcare literature.;BMC Palliat Care,2016

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3