Estimating Anesthesia Time Using the Medicare Claim

Author:

Silber Jeffrey H.1,Rosenbaum Paul R.2,Even-Shoshan Orit3,Mi Lanyu4,Kyle Fabienne A.5,Teng Yun4,Bratzler Dale W.6,Fleisher Lee A.7

Affiliation:

1. Professor, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Department of Pediatrics, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Department of Health Care Management, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylva

2. Professor, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Original Investigations, The University of Pennsylvania, Department of Statistics, The Wharton School, The University of Pennsylvania.

3. Associate Director, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, The Leonard Davis Institute of Health Original Investigations, The University of Pennsylvania.

4. Statistical Programmer, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

5. Research Assistant, Center for Outcomes Research, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia.

6. Principal Clinical Coordinator, Oklahoma Foundation for Medical Quality, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma.

7. Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, The University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

Abstract

Introduction Procedure length is a fundamental variable associated with quality of care, though seldom studied on a large scale. The authors sought to estimate procedure length through information obtained in the anesthesia claim submitted to Medicare to validate this method for future studies. Methods The Obesity and Surgical Outcomes Study enlisted 47 hospitals located across New York, Texas, and Illinois to study patients undergoing hip, knee, colon, and thoracotomy procedures. A total of 15,914 charts were abstracted to determine body mass index and initial patient physiology. Included in this abstraction were induction, cut, close, and recovery room times. This chart information was merged to Medicare claims that included anesthesia Part B billing information. Correlations between chart times and claim times were analyzed, models developed, and median absolute differences in minutes calculated. Results Of the 15,914 eligible patients, there were 14,369 for whom both chart and claim times were available for analysis. For these 14,369, the Spearman correlation between chart and claim time was 0.94 (95% CI 0.94, 0.95), and the median absolute difference between chart and claim time was only 5 min (95% CI: 5.0, 5.5). The anesthesia claim can also be used to estimate surgical procedure length, with only a modest increase in error. Conclusion The anesthesia bill found in Medicare claims provides an excellent source of information for studying surgery time on a vast scale throughout the United States. However, errors in both chart abstraction and anesthesia claims can occur. Care must be taken in the handling of outliers in these data.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine

Reference46 articles.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3