Abstract
With intensifying emphasis on episodes of care and bundled payments for surgical admissions, anesthesia expenditures are increasingly important in assessing variation in expenditures for surgical episodes. When comparing anesthesia expenditures across surgical settings, adjustment for anesthesia case complexity and duration of anesthesia services, also known as anesthesia service intensity, is desirable. A single anesthesia intensity measure allows researchers to make more direct comparisons between anesthesia outcomes across settings and services. We describe a process for creating a claims-based anesthesia intensity measure using Medicare claims. We create the measure using two fields: base units associated with American Medical Association Current Procedural Terminology codes on the anesthesia claim and time units associated with the service. We rescaled the time component of the anesthesia intensity measure to equally represent base units and time units. For illustration, we applied the measure to Medicare anesthesia expenditures stratified by rural/urban location. We found that adjustments for intensity were greater in urban settings because the level of intensity is greater. Compared with rural settings, unadjusted expenditures in urban settings are roughly 26 percent higher, whereas adjusted expenditures in urban settings are only 20 percent higher. Even absent longitudinal data, researchers can adjust anesthesia outcomes for intensity using our cross-sectional claims-based intensity method.
Reference13 articles.
1. 1. Dulisse B, Cromwell J. No harm found when nurse anesthetists work without supervision by physicians. Health Aff (Millwood) 2010;29(8):1469-75. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2008.0966
2. 2. French K, Guzman A, Rubio A, Frenzel J, Feeley T. Value based care and bundled payments: anesthesia care costs for outpatient oncology surgery using time-driven activity-based costing. Healthcare (Amst) 2016;4(3):173-80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. hjdsi.2015.08.007
3. 3. Sinclair DR, Lubarsky DA, Vigoda MM, Birnbach DJ, Harris EA, Behrens V, et al. A matrix model for valuing anesthesia service with the resource-based relative value system. J Multidiscip Healthc 2014;7:449-58. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S68671
4. 4. Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project (HCUP) [Internet]. June 2019. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. [cited 2019 Jul 2]. Available from: https://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/home.jsp
5. 5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Anesthesiologists center [Internet]. [cited 2018 June 29]. Available from: https://www.cms.gov/Center/Provider-Type/Anesthesiologists-Center.html?redirect=/center/anesth.asp