Describing the Physician Associate Clinical Training Site Compensation Market

Abstract

Introduction Inadequate clinical training site availability may inhibit physician assistant/associate (PA), advanced practice nursing (APN), and physician workforce growth. Educational institutions increasingly incentivize clinical training sites with financial compensation, with potential implications for educational costs and enrollment. This study investigated compensation trends among PA programs. Methods Data from the 2013 to 2019 PA Education Association Program Reports were examined. Multivariate logistic and linear regressions were estimated to identify the influence of PA program characteristics on clinical training site compensation. The effect of compensation on program enrollment was determined with a difference-in-differences estimator. Results Physician assistant/associate programs collectively paid nearly $19 million to clinical training sites in 2019. The percentage of programs that offer financial incentives increased from 22.2% in 2013 to 52.3% in 2019. Over this time, public institutions affiliated with academic health centers (AHCs) were least likely to offer compensation. Higher compensation rates were observed in Census divisions with greater number of programs, and programs located in New England were the most likely to offer compensation. Offering compensation did not influence growth in programs' enrollment. Discussion Compensation trends highlight increasing demand for PA clinical training sites, especially in areas with greater regional competition. Compensation is primarily driven by private institutions unaffiliated with AHCs. Programs likely offer compensation to maintain, rather than grow, enrollment. Additional investigation should incorporate medical school and APN program data to more fully examine the impact of these costs on learners, institutions, and the health care workforce.