Ambulatory blood pressure after 12 weeks of quadruple combination of quarter doses of blood pressure medication vs. standard medication

Author:

Nolde Janis M.1,Atkins Emily234,Marschner Simone34,Hillis Graham S.56,Chalmers John2,Billiot Laurent2,Nelson Mark R.7,Reid Christopher M.8,Hay Peter9,Burke Michael10,Jansen Shirley11,Usherwood Tim234,Rodgers Anthony2,Chow Clara K.234,Schlaich Markus P.15612

Affiliation:

1. Dobney Hypertension Centre, Medical School - Royal Perth Hospital Unit, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia

2. The George Institute for Global Health, University of New South Wales

3. Westmead Applied Research Centre, University of Sydney

4. Department of Cardiology, Westmead Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales

5. Department of Cardiology, Royal Perth Hospital

6. School of Medicine, The University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia

7. Menzies Institute for Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania

8. School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine Monash University, School of Population Health, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia

9. Castle Hill Medical Centre Sydney

10. School of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales

11. Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia

12. Neurovascular Hypertension & Kidney Disease Laboratory, Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

Abstract

Background: A combination of four ultra-low-dose blood pressure (BP) medications lowered office BP more effectively than initial monotherapy in the QUARTET trial. The effects on average ambulatory BP changes at 12 weeks have not yet been reported in detail. Methods: Adults with hypertension who were untreated or on monotherapy were eligible for participation. Overall, 591 participants were randomized to either the quadpill (irbesartan 37.5 mg, amlodipine 1.25 mg, indapamide 0.625 mg, and bisoprolol 2.5 mg) or monotherapy control (irbesartan 150 mg). The difference in 24-h, daytime, and night-time systolic and diastolic ambulatory BP at 12 weeks along further metrics were predefined secondary outcomes. Results: Of 576 participants, 289 were randomized to the quadpill group and 287 to the monotherapy group. At 12 weeks, mean 24-h ambulatory SBP and DBP were 7.7 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 9.6–5.8] and 5.3 (95% CI: 6.5–4.1) mmHg lower in the quadpill vs. monotherapy group (P < 0.001 for both). Similar reductions in the quadpill group were observed for daytime (8.1/5.7 mmHg lower) and night-time (6.3/4.0 mmHg lower) BP at 12 weeks (all P < 0.001) compared to monotherapy. The rate of BP control (24-h average BP < 130/80 mmHg) at 12 weeks was higher in the quadpill group (77 vs. 50%; P < 0.001). The reduction in BP load was also more pronounced with the quadpill. Conclusion: A quadruple quarter-dose combination compared with monotherapy resulted in greater ambulatory BP lowering across the entire 24-h period with higher ambulatory BP control rates and reduced BP variability at 12 weeks. These findings further substantiate the efficacy of an ultra-low-dose quadpill-based BP lowering strategy.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3