Coronary microvascular dysfunction and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: what are the mechanistic links?

Abstract

Purpose of review Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) accounts for half of all heart failure presentations and is associated with a dismal prognosis. HFpEF is an umbrella term that constitutes several distinct pathophysiological entities. Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined as the inability of the coronary vasculature to augment blood flow adequately in the absence of epicardial coronary artery disease, is highly prevalent amongst the HFpEF population and likely represents one distinct HFpEF endotype, the CMD-HFpEF endotype. This review appraises recent studies that have demonstrated an association between CMD and HFpEF with an aim to understand the pathophysiological links between the two. This is of significant clinical relevance as better understanding of the pathophysiology underlying CMD-HFpEF may result in more targeted and efficacious therapeutic options in this patient cohort. Recent findings There is a high prevalence of CMD, diagnosed invasively or noninvasively, in patients with HFpEF. Patients with HFpEF who have an impaired myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) have a worse outcome than those with a normal MPR. Both MPR and coronary flow reserve (CFR) are associated with measures of left ventricular diastolic function and left ventricular filling pressures during exercise. Impaired lusitropy and subendocardial ischaemia link CMD and HFpEF mechanistically. Summary CMD-HFpEF is a prevalent endotype of HFpEF and one that is associated with adverse cardiovascular prognosis. Whether CMD leads to HFpEF, through subendocardial ischaemia, or whether it is secondary to the impaired lusitropy that is characteristic of HFpEF is not known. Further mechanistic work is needed to answer this pertinent question.