Profunda Artery Perforator Flap Tongue Reconstruction: An Effective and Safe Alternative to the Anterolateral Thigh Flap

Abstract

Background: The anterolateral thigh (ALT) perforator flap is a workhorse flap for tongue reconstruction. The authors present an alternative option using the profunda artery perforator (PAP) flap for glossectomy reconstruction compared to the ALT flap. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 65 patients who underwent subtotal or total glossectomy reconstruction between 2016 and 2020 (46 ALT vs. 19 PAP flaps). Flap volume was assessed using CT scans at two different time points. Quality of life and functional outcomes were measured using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory for head and neck cancer (MDASI-HN). Results: Patients undergoing a PAP flap had significantly lower BMI compared to ALT flaps (22.7±5.0 vs. 25.8±5.1; p=0.014). Donor site and recipient site complications were similar as was the mean flap volume seven months after surgery (30.9% for ALT vs. 28.1% for PAP; p=0.93). Radiation and chemotherapy did not appear to have a significant effect on flap volume change over time. The most frequently reported high-severity items in MDASI-HN were swallowing/chewing and voice/speech for both cohorts. Patients who had reconstruction with a PAP flap had significantly better swallowing function (p=0.034). Conclusion: Both the PAP and ALT flaps appear to be safe and effective choices for subtotal and total tongue reconstruction. The PAP flap can serve as an alternative donor site, especially in the setting of malnourished patients with thin lateral thigh thickness undergoing reconstruction of extensive glossectomy defects.