Perceptions of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Acute Care Pediatric Physical Therapy

Author:

Tischler DanaORCID,Pitney William A.,Wood Janine,Shotwell Mary,Mooney Cade

Abstract

Purpose: To explore the perceptions and experiences of acute care pediatric physical therapists (PTs) regarding the use of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and to understand the influence of PROMs on clinical decision-making and the plan of care. Methods: Thirteen acute care pediatric PTs participated in individual semistructured interviews using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Interview questions focused on how PROMs influence clinical practice and decision-making. Interviews also explored scenarios where using PROMs positively or negatively impacted patient and caregiver interactions. Researchers analyzed the interview transcripts using an inductive process to generate codes and resultant themes. Results: Participants described their experiences using PROMs in pediatric acute care, and 4 themes emerged: (1) PROMs can be difficult to implement in pediatric acute care, (2) PROMs can benefit pediatric acute care practice, (3) PROMs can improve service delivery and family-centered care, and (4) ideal PROM use in future practice. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to categorize positive and negative factors related to implementing evidence-based guidelines in the pediatric acute care setting. Conclusions: Acute care pediatric PTs report benefits and barriers to using PROMs with children and caregivers in the hospital setting. Findings support the need for future knowledge translation initiatives to facilitate the use of PROMs in pediatric acute care.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine,Rehabilitation,Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3