Impact of Medical Training Programs on Time-to-Fill Physician Vacancies at the Veterans Health Administration

Author:

Li Yufei12,Legler Aaron2,Tenso Kertu12,Garrido Melissa12,Pizer Steven12

Affiliation:

1. Department of Health Law, Policy and Management, Boston University of Public Health, Boston, MA

2. Partnered Evidence-based Policy Resource Center, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, MA

Abstract

Background: The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) provides the largest Graduate Medical Education (GME) training platform for health professionals in the United States. Studies on the impact of VA GME programs on physician recruitment were lacking. Objectives: To examine the impact of the size of residency training programs at a VA facility on the facility’s time-to-fill physician vacancies, and whether the impact differs by the socioeconomic deprivation and public school quality of the geographic area. Project Design: We constructed an instrumental variable for training program size by interacting the facility clinicians share with the total training allocation nationally. Subjects: Our evaluation used national data on filled physician vacancies in the VA that were posted between 2020 and 2021. Measures: The outcome evaluated was time-to-fill physician vacancies. Our explanatory variable was the facility-year level number of physician residency slots. Results: For positions posted in 2020, an increase of one training slot was significantly associated with a decrease of 1.33 days to fill physician vacancies (95% CI, 0.38–2.28) in facilities in less deprived areas, a decrease of 1.50 days (95% CI, 0.75–2.25) in facilities with better public schools, a decrease of 3.30 days (95% CI, 0.85–5.76) in facilities in both less deprived areas and better public schools. We found similar results for positions posted in 2020 and 2021 when limiting time-to-fill to <500 days. Conclusions: We found that increasing the size of the residency program at a VA facility could decrease the facility’s time-to-fill vacant physician positions in places with less socioeconomic deprivation or better public schools.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3