The Relationship Between Regional Growth in Neonatal Intensive Care Capacity and Perinatal Risk

Author:

Davis Rebekah12,Stuchlik Patrick M.1,Goodman David C.13

Affiliation:

1. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH

2. University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO

3. The Children’s Hospital at Dartmouth, Lebanon, NH

Abstract

Background: The supply of US neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) beds and neonatologists is known to vary markedly across regions, but there have been no investigation of patterns of recent growth (1991–2017) in NICUs in relation to newborn need. Objective: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that greater growth in NICU capacity occurred in neonatal intensive care regions with higher perinatal risk. Research Design: A longitudinal ecological analysis with neonatal intensive care regions (n=246) as the units of analysis. Associations were tested using linear regression. Subjects: All US live births ≥400 g in 1991 (n=4,103,528) and 2017 (n=3,849,644). Measures: Primary measures of risk were the proportions of low–birth weight and very low–birth weight newborns and mothers who were Black or had low educational attainment. Results: Over 26 years, the numbers of NICU beds and neonatologists per live birth increased 42% and 200%, respectively, with marked variation in growth across regions (interquartile range: 0.3–4.1, beds; neonatologists, 0.4–1.0 per 1000 live births). A weak association of capacity with perinatal risk in 1991 was absent in 2017. There was no meaningful (ie, clinical or policy relevant) association between regional changes in capacity and regions with higher perinatal risk or lower capacity in 1991; higher increases in perinatal risk were not associated with higher capacity growth. Conclusion: The lack of association between newborn medical needs and the supply of NICU resources raises questions about the current effectiveness of newborn care at a population level.

Publisher

Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health)

Subject

Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3