Hospital-Level NICU Capacity, Utilization, and 30-Day Outcomes in Texas

Author:

Goodman David C.12,Stuchlik Patrick1,Ganduglia-Cazaban Cecilia3,Tyson Jon E.4,Leyenaar JoAnna12,Avritscher Elenir B. C.4,Rysavy Mathew4,Gautham Kanekal S.5,Lynch David6,Stukel Therese A.78, ,Bronner Kristen K9,Kim Youngran9,Little George9,Schulman Joseph9,Taylor Jordan9

Affiliation:

1. The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire

2. The Children’s Hospital at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire

3. Center for Health Care Data and Department of Management, Policy, and Community Health, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

4. Institute for Clinical Research and Learning Health Care, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston

5. Division of Neonatology, Department of Pediatrics, Nemours Children’s Health, Orlando, Florida

6. The University of Texas at Austin

7. ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

8. Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada

9. for the Texas Neonatal Care Research Collaborative

Abstract

ImportanceRisk-adjusted neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) utilization and outcomes vary markedly across regions and hospitals. The causes of this variation are poorly understood.ObjectiveTo assess the association of hospital-level NICU bed capacity with utilization and outcomes in newborn cohorts with differing levels of health risk.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based retrospective cohort study included all Medicaid-insured live births in Texas from 2010 to 2014 using linked vital records and maternal and newborn claims data. Participants were Medicaid-insured singleton live births (LBs) with birth weights of at least 400 g and gestational ages between 22 and 44 weeks. Newborns were grouped into 3 cohorts: very low birth weight (VLBW; <1500 g), late preterm (LPT; 34-36 weeks’ gestation), and nonpreterm newborns (NPT; ≥37 weeks’ gestation). Data analysis was conducted from January 2022 to October 2023.ExposureHospital NICU capacity measured as reported NICU beds/100 LBs, adjusted (ie, allocated) for transfers.Main Outcomes and MeasuresNICU admissions and special care days; inpatient mortality and 30-day postdischarge adverse events (ie, mortality, emergency department visit, admission, observation stay).ResultsThe overall cohort of 874 280 single LBs included 9938 VLBW (5054 [50.9%] female; mean [SD] birth weight, 1028.9 [289.6] g; mean [SD] gestational age, 27.6 [2.6] wk), 63 160 LPT (33 684 [53.3%] female; mean [SD] birth weight, 2664.0 [409.4] g; mean [SD] gestational age, 35.4 [0.8] wk), and 801 182 NPT (407 977 [50.9%] female; mean [SD] birth weight, 3318.7 [383.4] g; mean [SD] gestational age, 38.9 [1.0] wk) LBs. Median (IQR) NICU capacity was 0.84 (0.57-1.30) allocated beds/100 LB/year. For VLBW newborns, NICU capacity was not associated with the risk of NICU admission or number of special care days. For LPT newborns, birth in hospitals with the highest compared with the lowest category of capacity was associated with a 17% higher risk of NICU admission (adjusted risk ratio [aRR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.01-1.33). For NPT newborns, risk of NICU admission was 55% higher (aRR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.22-1.97) in the highest- vs the lowest-capacity hospitals. The number of special care days for LPT and NPT newborns was 21% (aRR, 1.21; 95% CI,1.08-1.36) and 37% (aRR, 1.37; 95% CI, 1.08-1.74) higher in the highest vs lowest capacity hospitals, respectively. Among LPT and NPT newborns, NICU capacity was associated with higher inpatient mortality and 30-day postdischarge adverse events.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cohort study of Medicaid-insured newborns in Texas, greater hospital NICU bed supply was associated with increased NICU utilization in newborns born LPT and NPT. Higher capacity was not associated with lower risk of adverse events. These findings raise important questions about how the NICU is used for newborns with lower risk.

Publisher

American Medical Association (AMA)

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3